https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41769
Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|PATCH_TO_REVIEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41769
Gerrit Notification Bot gerritad...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41769
--- Comment #11 from Gerrit Notification Bot gerritad...@wikimedia.org ---
Change 95391 had a related patch set uploaded by MarkAHershberger:
(bug 41769) Add frame:callParserFunction() and frame::extensionTag()
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41769
--- Comment #12 from Gerrit Notification Bot gerritad...@wikimedia.org ---
Change 95391 merged by MarkAHershberger:
(bug 41769) Add frame:callParserFunction() and frame::extensionTag()
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/95391
--
You are
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41769
--- Comment #9 from Brad Jorsch bjor...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #8)
I take that to mean the change is *not* supposed to be released as part of
1.21.
Fine with me.
Take it more literally: If 1.21 should be compatible with a
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41769
--- Comment #10 from Gerrit Notification Bot gerritad...@wikimedia.org ---
Related URL: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/59637 (Gerrit Change
I339b882010dedd714e7965e25ad650ed8b8cd48f)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41769
PleaseStand pleasest...@live.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pleasest...@live.com
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41769
--- Comment #7 from Brad Jorsch bjor...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Is Gerrit change #52060 necessary for Scribunto compatibility with MW 1.21?
Only if you want to use a version of Scribunto later than
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41769
PleaseStand pleasest...@live.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |MW 1.22 version
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41769
Brad Jorsch bjor...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41769
Brad Jorsch bjor...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41769
Brad Jorsch bjor...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch-in-gerrit
--
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41769
Yannick Perret yper...@in2p3.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yper...@in2p3.fr
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41769
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Friesen mediawiki-b...@nadir-seen-fire.com ---
(In reply to comment #1)
As far as I know parser functions are not real templates (but it uses the
same syntax so...).
Calling fullurl works if you use
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41769
--- Comment #3 from Yannick Perret yper...@in2p3.fr ---
That's true. It can be used as a workaround but not for general use.
Whatever I still think that the best way is to treat these features at Lua/C
level in order to avoid calling
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41769
Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Normal
--
You
16 matches
Mail list logo
