https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44299
--- Comment #3 from Krinkle ---
Asserting that modules load without errors is trivial to implement in QUnit.
That's the cheapest, most reliable and appropiate way to test it. No need to do
this from Selenium (which would do it only from qa-brow
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44299
Željko Filipin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Željko F
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44299
Željko Filipin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia. |zfili...@wikimedia.org
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44299
--- Comment #1 from Željko Filipin ---
We had a similar discussion recently at e3-t...@lists.wikimedia.org. (I could
not find the list at https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo. Subject was
"testing extension JS code").
That should be ea
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44299
Željko Filipin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krinklem...@gmail.com
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44299
Chris McMahon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zfili...@wikimedia.org
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44299
Andre Klapper changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |High
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44299
sp...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cmcma...@wikimedia.org
--
You ar
