https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46021
--- Comment #9 from Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #8)
LinkedIn was solved centrally too, contacting LinkedIn.
Does not sound like a blacklist solution then? Does that mean that contacting
Badoo (and Twoo?)
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46021
--- Comment #10 from Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
LinkedIn was solved centrally too, contacting LinkedIn.
Does not sound like a blacklist solution then? Does that mean that
contacting
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46021
Daniel Zahn dz...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dz...@wikimedia.org
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46021
--- Comment #6 from Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it ---
Yes I know this, but I said globally for a reason. If you think that
rejecting all messages with X-Spam-Score = 2.4 on all lists is the solution,
fine.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46021
--- Comment #7 from Daniel Zahn dz...@wikimedia.org ---
It's up to list admins to decide which spam score is their threshhold and what
they want to block. I really don't want to get into global blocks if avoidable
in any way and i think that is
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46021
--- Comment #8 from Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it ---
We only had LinkedIn, Badoo and perhaps Twoo (?) spamming many lists. LinkedIn
was solved centrally too, contacting LinkedIn. We have hundreds of lists...
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46021
Snowolf wikimedia.b...@snowolf.eu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46021
MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b...@mzmcbride.com
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46021
--- Comment #4 from Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Why is there a star there?
It's the character in their summaries by which I immediately spot their spam in
my email...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46021
Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46021
Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46021
--- Comment #1 from Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it ---
By the way, as we strip the Sender header (feature removed in mailman 2.1.14
or 3.0, but we're at 2.1.13 https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/266824 ),
the Reply-To is the only way to know
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46021
Daniel Friesen mediawiki-b...@nadir-seen-fire.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46021
Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46021
Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Normal
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46021
--- Comment #2 from Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Sure, mailman could be smarter at understanding who's the true sender [...]
But they don't want to, see upstream report:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46021
Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
17 matches
Mail list logo
