https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56797
Tisza Gergő gti...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56797
Mark Holmquist mtrac...@member.fsf.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Normal |Low
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56797
Tisza Gergő gti...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gti...@gmail.com
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56797
--- Comment #2 from Fabrice Florin fflo...@wikimedia.org ---
Thanks for pointing this out, Dominic! Are you sure that the 'date' field of
the 'Information' template of the description is used inconsistently? I thought
that field was clearly
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56797
Fabrice Florin fflo...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Normal
--
You
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56797
--- Comment #3 from Dmcdevit dmcde...@cox.net ---
It's not so much inconsistency as variability of meaning. The concept of
creation doesn't apply equally to all media or types of works. And there is
inherent uncertainty when you make a
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56797
--- Comment #4 from Tisza Gergő gti...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Gergo,if we are using different types of dates in the same place, I think we
should change the label to clearly indicate what users are seeing: 'Created
by' or
