https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57829
--- Comment #6 from Arthur Richards ---
Head's up that Erik got us yet another new license, which reenabled anonymous
access.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57829
--- Comment #5 from Erik Moeller ---
Huh, bizarre - thanks for the pointer, Nemo, will poke.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57829
Nemo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57829
--- Comment #3 from Erik Moeller ---
It's hosted on the office servers right now, but engineering manages the
license - IT can't help, so please close the ticket with them to avoid
confusion. I already requested a new key, and we're moving to
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57829
--- Comment #2 from Steven Walling ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > Not sure who to poke about this. Just cc'ing random folks.
>
> IIRC it's managed by Office IT, but bugzilla doesn't find any account for
> Chip
> an
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57829
Nemo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||federicol...@tiscali.it
--- Comment #1 from Nem
