[Bug 67533] security review of WikibaseQuery

2014-09-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67533 Chris Steipp cste...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||67536 -- You are

[Bug 67533] security review of WikibaseQuery

2014-08-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67533 --- Comment #8 from Jeroen De Dauw jeroen_ded...@yahoo.com --- Regardless, I'm pretty sure we're not going to change our minds about security review by debating in a bug. Not sure debate is happening. I never even asked to change the

[Bug 67533] security review of WikibaseQuery

2014-08-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67533 --- Comment #7 from Nik Everett neverett+bugzi...@wikimedia.org --- (In reply to Chris Steipp from comment #6) (In reply to Jeroen De Dauw from comment #5) Given that, I'm not sure it makes sense to do a real security review of these

[Bug 67533] security review of WikibaseQuery

2014-08-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67533 --- Comment #4 from Chris Steipp cste...@wikimedia.org --- Hi guys, can you explain the reasoning for using doctrine's DBAL and Symphony's console, instead of the standard MediaWiki classes? Reviewing those (~80 kloc) is going to take some

[Bug 67533] security review of WikibaseQuery

2014-08-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67533 --- Comment #5 from Jeroen De Dauw jeroen_ded...@yahoo.com --- The MediaWiki code is not reusable - it's bound to the rest of the MediaWiki framework. Both the code itself and the things it's bound to have serious design issues, little test

[Bug 67533] security review of WikibaseQuery

2014-08-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67533 --- Comment #6 from Chris Steipp cste...@wikimedia.org --- (In reply to Jeroen De Dauw from comment #5) Given that, I'm not sure it makes sense to do a real security review of these components. Is WMF doing security reviews of other tools it

[Bug 67533] security review of WikibaseQuery

2014-07-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67533 --- Comment #2 from Jeroen De Dauw jeroen_ded...@yahoo.com --- As far as I can tell, the offset parameter is limited to 50, and can thus not cause full index scans. Is that wrong? If we would want to allow further pagination, using a

[Bug 67533] security review of WikibaseQuery

2014-07-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67533 --- Comment #3 from Sergey Vladimirov vlser...@gmail.com --- Sorry, i didn't notice the limit in API declaration. In this case... well, it's just unusable from my point of view. But it is not a security concern, of course :-) I hope changed

[Bug 67533] security review of WikibaseQuery

2014-07-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67533 Sergey Vladimirov vlser...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 67533] security review of WikibaseQuery

2014-07-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67533 Nik Everett neverett+bugzi...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 67533] security review of WikibaseQuery

2014-07-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67533 Lydia Pintscher lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|Unprioritized |Highest