https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
--- Comment #33 from Scott Martin ---
That's a very reasonable request, Nemo, and I'll see if I can have a stab at
it. Strikes me as a useful opportunity for a learning experience as well.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the a
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
--- Comment #32 from Nemo ---
(In reply to Nemo from comment #28)
> In what does this differ from mergehistory?
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.technical/56356
Scott, we're still waiting for an answer to this ques
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
--- Comment #31 from Andre Klapper ---
(In reply to Scott Martin from comment #30)
> Can this be normal priority rather than low?
It won't change much as long as nobody works on a patch...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
--- Comment #30 from Scott Martin ---
Can this be normal priority rather than low? History merges are a regular
maintenance task, and it would be really great to be able to do it simply.
Incidentally, I recently had to undo a mistaken history
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
Andre Klapper changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Normal |Low
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
--- Comment #29 from Graham87 ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> In what does this differ from mergehistory?
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.technical/56356
>
This extension would make it possible to separate edits w
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
Nemo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|41492 |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
Nemo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Special pages |Extensions requests
Product|MediaWik
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
Church of emacs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|church.of.emacs...@gmail.co |wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
Andre Klapper changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|patch-need-review |
--- Comment #26 from Andre Klapper -
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
Nemo_bis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||41492
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzil
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
Nemo_bis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch-need-review
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
--- Comment #25 from FT2 2011-10-02 10:51:58 UTC ---
Comment 20 states "This bug was for a feature to be developed. It exists now,
so this bug should remain closed."
But r86155 states it was backed out "until somebody has the time to work on i
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
Chad H. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
--- Comment #23 from xenocidic 2010-07-14 14:08:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> (In reply to comment #21)
> > (In reply to comment #20)
> > > Don't mix code issues with site configuration. This bug was for a feature
> > > to be
> > > de
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
Chad H. changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||innocentkil...@gmail.com
--- Comment #22 fro
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
--- Comment #21 from xenocidic 2010-07-14 14:04:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> Don't mix code issues with site configuration. This bug was for a feature to
> be
> developed. It exists now, so this bug should remain closed. All requests
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
Max Semenik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
xenocidic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
--- Comment #18 from Church of emacs 2010-06-28
14:17:01 UTC ---
This function messes around with the database, so I think the code should be
reviewed before it goes live on a public test wiki.
A review would be nice, though :)
And of course
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
--- Comment #17 from FT2 2010-06-28 12:47:51 UTC ---
Is this available on any WMF test wiki? To see how it works?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: --
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
Church of emacs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
--- Comment #15 from FT2 2010-05-14 23:19:57 UTC ---
I'm not convinced that "It wasn't covered in the past" and "old extensions
don't always do it" are good rationales. Surely the eseence of a wiki is to be
able to trace who did what, and to im
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
--- Comment #14 from Church of emacs 2010-05-13
17:25:56 UTC ---
Hi FT2, thanks for your feedback.
(In reply to comment #12)
> At the risk of proliferating an extra table or an extra field, this is a
> one-way lookup, from (log action id) ->
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
--- Comment #13 from FT2 2010-05-12 09:25:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Here's what I'd like to to:
> (Snip)
> Considering the fact that we want to move away from the archive table system,
> this probably will only work for not-deleted
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
--- Comment #12 from FT2 2010-05-12 09:08:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> One problem might be logging of such events. It is not feasible to have a log
> entry for each individual moved revision, but an entry like "x Revisions have
> been
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
--- Comment #11 from Church of emacs 2010-04-26
19:44:51 UTC ---
It is for oversights and stewards.
By imposing permission restrictions, I think we can justify this lack of
transparency. Admins can do a lot of nasty stuff, this would just be
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
Reedy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@reedyboy.net
--- Comment #10 from Reedy
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
--- Comment #9 from Church of emacs 2010-04-26
19:30:32 UTC ---
One problem might be logging of such events. It is not feasible to have a log
entry for each individual moved revision, but an entry like "x Revisions have
been moved" doesn't tel
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
Church of emacs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
--- Comment #7 from FT2 2009-10-29 16:00:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> What about copyvios? What about people who just want
> to clear the history of their userpage?
Both are easily handled by RevisionDelete. In the former case t
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
--- Comment #6 from xenocidic 2009-10-29 15:33:24 UTC ---
Nonetheless, disabling selective deletion just seems like unnecessarily
limiting choice.
I suppose the ability to disable it on a site-by-site basis could be provided
and a discus
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
--- Comment #5 from Alex Z. 2009-10-29 14:34:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> > 3/ Prevent selective undelete (only allow full delete/full restore)
>
> What about copyvios?
These can be deleted using RevisionDelete, if necessary
>
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
xenocidic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xenow...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
--- Comment #3 from Alex Z. 2009-10-29 00:46:38 UTC ---
As long as the logging is good, this would also have the effect of making
history merges a lot more reversible than now.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userpr
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
FT2 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ft2.w...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from FT2
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
Graham87 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||graha...@jazi.net
--- Comment #1 from G
37 matches
Mail list logo
