https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
Bartosz Dziewoński changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||at.li...@live.com.au
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
--- Comment #34 from Krinkle 2012-09-23 15:38:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #32)
> I wonder, would doing
>
> echo $wgHTML5 ? "" : '";
>
> be an acceptable solution for all parties?
No.
(In reply to comment #33)
> ;) so I'd like to just
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
--- Comment #33 from Daniel Friesen
2012-09-23 14:34:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> > Got a reference to the changeset they did that in?
> > Frankly it's irrelevant since we're aiming for HTML5, not XHTML.
>
> I know. But we can run w
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
--- Comment #32 from Platonides 2012-09-23 13:47:21 UTC
---
I wonder, would doing
echo $wgHTML5 ? "" : '";
be an acceptable solution for all parties?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- Yo
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
--- Comment #31 from Platonides 2012-09-23 13:43:40 UTC
---
> Got a reference to the changeset they did that in?
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-mediawiki/mediawiki/trunk/debian/patches/fix_invalid_xhtml.patch
There are several xhtml is
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
--- Comment #30 from Daniel Friesen
2012-09-23 13:28:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> Note that debian is patching this to generate valid html (I haven't tested if
> scripts break, do we even have a list of affected ones?). It would be n
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
--- Comment #29 from Platonides 2012-09-23 13:03:30 UTC
---
Note that debian is patching this to generate valid html (I haven't tested if
scripts break, do we even have a list of affected ones?). It would be nice to
fix it upstream.
--
Confi
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
--- Comment #28 from Phillip Patriakeas
2012-09-23 01:45:33 UTC ---
> Its not a stupid question, but I did answer it already. The reason the
> placeholders are needed is because skins generate their portlets all in
> different ways (and even t
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
--- Comment #27 from Krinkle 2012-09-23 01:35:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> Why not just have addPortletLink check if the specified portlet exists in the
> DOM and
> , if not, generate it?
Its not a stupid question, but I did answer
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
Phillip Patriakeas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dragonlordofxanther@gmail.c
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
--- Comment #25 from Krinkle 2012-09-23 00:01:29 UTC ---
Exactly.
* The HTML-validness of empty portlets is an invalid problem per bug 23015 and
bug 23575.
* Empty portlets in general is because different skins output portlets in
different po
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
--- Comment #24 from Daniel Friesen
2012-09-22 23:28:40 UTC ---
Simple inconsistent programming. If you need to add some languages dynamically
feel free to open a bug to have #p-lang outputted as an .emptyPortlet.
:empty can't be used. Compat
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
--- Comment #23 from Bartosz Dziewoński 2012-09-22
23:06:48 UTC ---
Then explain why #p-lang (LANGUAGES portal) is not outputted on Vector if it
would have been empty. (I actually had to work around this in LivePreview.)
Maybe something like
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
Daniel Friesen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Blocks|457
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
Bartosz Dziewoński changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||457
--
Configure bugmail: https:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
Bartosz Dziewoński changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
--- Comment #20 from Krinkle 2011-06-21 18:03:20 UTC ---
Just nothing here for the record, as being reported in "MediaWiki core >
Vector skin" this is no longer valid as MediaWiki has wgHTML5 enabled by
default on all new wikis.
Wikimedia's o
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
--- Comment #19 from Aryeh Gregor 2011-06-20
22:46:36 UTC ---
*** Bug 23026 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
Aryeh Gregor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |WONTFIX
--- Comment #18 from Aryeh Greg
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
Krinkle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
Krinkle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jida...@jidanni.org
--- Comment #16 from Kri
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
--- Comment #15 from Christopher Yeleighton 2011-06-18
21:12:58 UTC ---
FTR: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Project:Current_issues#Please_use_HTML5_DOCTYPE_4677
>
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
--- Comment #14 from Aryeh Gregor 2011-06-16
14:18:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> If you prefer HTML5, that is your choice. However, the document does not meet
> the requirements of XHTML 1.0 and this declaration should be removed, or
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
--- Comment #13 from Roan Kattouw 2011-06-16 10:17:51
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> If you prefer HTML5, that is your choice. However, the document does not meet
> the requirements of XHTML 1.0 and this declaration should be removed, or
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
--- Comment #12 from Christopher Yeleighton 2011-06-16
07:23:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I have a very very hard time imagining how a browser could possibly choke on
> an
> empty in any way, shape or form. It makes zero sense for
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
Christopher Yeleighton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||giecr...@stegny.2a.pl
--- Com
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
Bawolff changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ho94...@gmail.com
--- Comment #10 from Bawol
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
Chad H. changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wpedz...@wp.pl
--- Comment #9 from Chad H.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
Bawolff changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haikar...@gmail.com
--- Comment #8 from Bawo
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
--- Comment #7 from Roan Kattouw 2010-07-23 11:04:39
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Special pages have also empty "Actions" and "Views".
>
> Why should user using agent without CSS see things he doesn't need to see at
> all? Didn't we wan
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
Danny B. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Do not output variant |Do not output empty
|port
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
Aryeh Gregor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simetrical+wikib...@gmail.c
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
Danny B. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
Roan Kattouw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500
MZMcBride changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b...@mzmcbride.com
--- Comment #1 from MZM
35 matches
Mail list logo
