https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27539
--- Comment #4 from ThomasV thoma...@gmx.de 2011-02-19 10:49:58 UTC ---
XML compliance is a great idea, but it should have been decided right from the
beginning. Here we have a major regression that affects thousands of pages, I
think it should
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27539
Sean Colombo s...@lyricwiki.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27539
Sean Colombo s...@lyricwiki.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|thoma...@gmx.de |s...@lyricwiki.org
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27539
--- Comment #6 from Platonides platoni...@gmail.com 2011-02-19 19:45:11 UTC
---
It needs to be tagged as 1.17wmf1 (and probably 1.17 too). But I wouldn't have
added . and - to begin an attribute. I will remove them if you don't mind.
--
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27539
Platonides platoni...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27539
ThomasV thoma...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||code-update-regression
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27539
Platonides platoni...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||platoni...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27539
Sean Colombo s...@lyricwiki.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@lyricwiki.org
