[Bug 40672] Abuse filter: Increase 5% limit to allow filtering for very short posts
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40672 Matthias Mullie mmul...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 40672] Abuse filter: Increase 5% limit to allow filtering for very short posts
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40672 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Mullie mmul...@wikimedia.org 2012-10-23 13:27:08 UTC --- I suggest to make this configurable per Filter group. It makes sense to treat different kinds of text (e.g. articles vs feedback) differently. I've pushed a couple of patches: * https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/29570/ AbuseFilter change: make it possible for other extensions to define new emergency shutdown values per filter group * https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/29569/ ArticleFeedback change: set different values for AFT then the current AbuseFilter defaults (which are more conservative) * https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/29571/ Config change: update WMF config to use the above method The emergency shutdown values for regular article submission would remain unchanged, the values for feedback would become: - 10% rather than 5% - sample size from 25 to 50 How does that sound? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 40672] Abuse filter: Increase 5% limit to allow filtering for very short posts
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40672 Fabrice Florin fflo...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bs...@wikimedia.org, ||rkald...@wikimedia.org --- Comment #4 from Fabrice Florin fflo...@wikimedia.org 2012-10-23 16:40:29 UTC --- Thanks, Matthias, this sounds great to me! Andrew, do these revisions work for you as well? If so, could you please review them and/or propose edits? Nicely done! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 40672] Abuse filter: Increase 5% limit to allow filtering for very short posts
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40672 Fabrice Florin fflo...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||agarr...@wikimedia.org, ||oke...@wikimedia.org Summary|Abuse filter for very short |Abuse filter: Increase 5% |posts |limit to allow filtering ||for very short posts --- Comment #2 from Fabrice Florin fflo...@wikimedia.org 2012-10-22 21:29:13 UTC --- Hi Andre, I believe we will need to make a modification to the Abuse filter extension to increase the cutoff for disabling articles to a higher value than 5% -- possibly up to 10%. Right now, filter 458 only disallows posts with 2 characters or less, because it gets automatically disabled if we try 3, 4 or 5 characters. We really want to disallow posts with 5 characters or less ASAP, and ultimately even 10 characters or less. One way to accomplish that is to increase the value for disabling articles. To quote extension creator Andrew Garrett: The AbuseFilter has a special mechanism for new filters in which filters that match more than X% of the actions that they are compared against are disabled. It is presumed that any filter that matches more than X% of actions is out of control. The current value of X is 5. In order to determine whether a filter matching more than X% of actions is actually out of control or just unlucky, we need a decent sample size. So the minimum sample size is Y, the variable that we changed from 2 to 25. The goal would be to have a higher cut-off for feedback than for edits -- so we don't disrupt the current cutoff used for edits, only increase the cutoff for feedback posts … We are now waiting for Andrew Garrett and Matthias Mullie to offer a recommendation on that point, as well as assess the complexity of this proposed revision. If we're only talking about a couple hours of development, I think we should do it, so we don't have to keep resetting the filters manually. I suspect that we will need a higher limit anyway before we can deploy AFT5 to 100%. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
