https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41442
--- Comment #4 from Siddhartha Ghai siddhartha.g...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Bartosz Dziewoński from comment #3)
Is this still a problem? We improved the line-height handling somewhat per
bug 49965.
Tested at
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41442
Bartosz Dziewoński matma@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41442
Quiddity pandiculat...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41442
Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||i18n
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41442
Siddhartha Ghai siddhartha.g...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||41348
--
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41442
--- Comment #1 from Marius Hoch h...@online.de 2012-10-26 23:50:03 UTC ---
Setting sup.references line-height to 1 makes it less worse, but the only way I
could get it fully resolved was by adding:
sup.reference { position: absolute;
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41442
Siddhartha Ghai siddhartha.g...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|