[Bug 47274] Custom repo name mapping for Gerrit/Git integration

2013-05-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47274 --- Comment #15 from Andrew Otto o...@wikimedia.org --- Bump! How goes it? :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug 47274] Custom repo name mapping for Gerrit/Git integration

2013-04-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47274 Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|Unprioritized |Normal -- You

[Bug 47274] Custom repo name mapping for Gerrit/Git integration

2013-04-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47274 --- Comment #14 from Andrew Otto o...@wikimedia.org --- Hm, ok. Any idea of how long it might take to get them merged and upgraded? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 47274] Custom repo name mapping for Gerrit/Git integration

2013-04-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47274 --- Comment #10 from christ...@quelltextlich.at --- (In reply to comment #7) If you do not want to do automatic mangling of ${name} you can go straight for the Url to push to. Hm, wait, we can do this manually? That's fine for my

[Bug 47274] Custom repo name mapping for Gerrit/Git integration

2013-04-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47274 --- Comment #11 from Chad H. innocentkil...@gmail.com --- I wonder if we could combine the approach I did awhile back in https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/37711/ with that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee

[Bug 47274] Custom repo name mapping for Gerrit/Git integration

2013-04-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47274 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Otto o...@wikimedia.org --- Awesome! This is all I really need to feel all warm and squishy. Is this live in our gerrit? Or do we need to wait until its accepted and we upgrade? -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 47274] Custom repo name mapping for Gerrit/Git integration

2013-04-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47274 --- Comment #13 from Chad H. innocentkil...@gmail.com --- Would like them merged so we don't fork, but since they're parts of the replication plugin (and not core) upgrading is easy. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[Bug 47274] Custom repo name mapping for Gerrit/Git integration

2013-04-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47274 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Otto o...@wikimedia.org --- BTW, I have had long discussions with Chad and Mark and Faidon about this. I even discussed implementation with Chad a bit about it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[Bug 47274] Custom repo name mapping for Gerrit/Git integration

2013-04-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47274 --- Comment #6 from Chad H. innocentkil...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #5) BTW, I have had long discussions with Chad and Mark and Faidon about this. I even discussed implementation with Chad a bit about it. Yes, and I wasn't opposed

[Bug 47274] Custom repo name mapping for Gerrit/Git integration

2013-04-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47274 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Otto o...@wikimedia.org --- If you do not want to do automatic mangling of ${name} you can go straight for the Url to push to. Hm, wait, we can do this manually? That's fine for my purposes. I'm not sure how

[Bug 47274] Custom repo name mapping for Gerrit/Git integration

2013-04-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47274 --- Comment #8 from Diederik van Liere dvanli...@gmail.com --- But how important is it really to be able to automatically infer the Gerrit repo name from the github repo name? A simple reference in the README.md to the Gerrit repo name can do

[Bug 47274] Custom repo name mapping for Gerrit/Git integration

2013-04-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47274 --- Comment #9 from jeremyb bugzilla+org.wikime...@tuxmachine.com --- In addition to the README you can set the URL for the repo to be the URL for the same repo at gerrit unless there's some better place to link to. But yeah, README should be

[Bug 47274] Custom repo name mapping for Gerrit/Git integration

2013-04-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47274 Andrew Otto o...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||o...@wikimedia.org

[Bug 47274] Custom repo name mapping for Gerrit/Git integration

2013-04-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47274 --- Comment #2 from christ...@quelltextlich.at --- (In reply to comment #0) Currently, Gerrit repositories get automatically prefixed with their parent project such that the 'puppet' repo is called 'operations-puppet'. In gerrit, project

[Bug 47274] Custom repo name mapping for Gerrit/Git integration

2013-04-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47274 --- Comment #3 from christ...@quelltextlich.at --- (In reply to comment #1) Currently the gerrit replication plugin only supports minimal slash '/' replacement in gerrit repository names. That's only partly true. You can push to whatever Url

[Bug 47274] Custom repo name mapping for Gerrit/Git integration

2013-04-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47274 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Otto o...@wikimedia.org --- Or is there something wrong with the way we name our repos in gerrit? I think yes, but this is a big discussion I haven't had the guts to start yet. Motivation: I am maintaining