[Bug 47289] l10n cache doesn't actually cache (due to specific extension localization pair not in hash, marking the cache as invalid)

2014-01-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47289 --- Comment #17 from Daniel Renfro dren...@vistaprint.com --- For the life of me I cannot reproduce this. It seems to be caused by sunspots or maybe the phase of the moon. For a while there the localization cache was convinced it was out of

[Bug 47289] l10n cache doesn't actually cache (due to specific extension localization pair not in hash, marking the cache as invalid)

2014-01-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47289 Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 47289] l10n cache doesn't actually cache (due to specific extension localization pair not in hash, marking the cache as invalid)

2014-01-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47289 --- Comment #16 from Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org --- (In reply to comment #9) The problem turned out to be an extension that was loading another extension, (In reply to comment #10) can you give links to the source code of the

[Bug 47289] l10n cache doesn't actually cache (due to specific extension localization pair not in hash, marking the cache as invalid)

2013-10-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47289 Daniel Renfro dren...@vistaprint.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 47289] l10n cache doesn't actually cache (due to specific extension localization pair not in hash, marking the cache as invalid)

2013-09-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47289 --- Comment #14 from Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org --- Victor: Did you find time to ask? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 47289] l10n cache doesn't actually cache (due to specific extension localization pair not in hash, marking the cache as invalid)

2013-07-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47289 --- Comment #12 from Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org --- Victor Danilchenko: Could you answer comment 10, please? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 47289] l10n cache doesn't actually cache (due to specific extension localization pair not in hash, marking the cache as invalid)

2013-07-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47289 --- Comment #13 from Victor Danilchenko vdanilche...@vistaprint.net --- I will need to get authorization to do so, after my manager returns from vacation. Give me a little time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for

[Bug 47289] l10n cache doesn't actually cache (due to specific extension localization pair not in hash, marking the cache as invalid)

2013-05-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47289 Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|Unprioritized |Low -- You are

[Bug 47289] l10n cache doesn't actually cache (due to specific extension localization pair not in hash, marking the cache as invalid)

2013-05-12 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47289 --- Comment #11 from Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org --- Victor: Could you answer comment 10, please? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 47289] l10n cache doesn't actually cache (due to specific extension localization pair not in hash, marking the cache as invalid)

2013-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47289 Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|l10n cache doesn't actually |l10n cache