[Bug 49631] PageCuration isn't using section=new
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49631 --- Comment #1 from Nischay Nahata nischay...@gmail.com --- Thanks for the bug report! I couldn't understand the problem completely. The template http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Reviewednote-NPF does create a new section with the title A page you started has been reviewed! or is there something I got wrong here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 49631] PageCuration isn't using section=new
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49631 Redrose64 m...@redrose64.plus.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@redrose64.plus.com --- Comment #2 from Redrose64 m...@redrose64.plus.com --- I don't know if it's the problem that MZ is thinking of, but I notice that there is no edit summary; normally, when you use the new section tab, you don't get an input field for the edit summary - it's forced to /* +section title+ */ new section, as in /* A page you started has been reviewed! */ new section -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 49631] PageCuration isn't using section=new
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49631 --- Comment #3 from Nischay Nahata nischay...@gmail.com --- The page is being edited using the api, for some reason (I should consult the original developers) there isn't any edit summary provided. However the section title I mentioned i.e. A page you started has been reviewed! is provided by the Template; thus its not related to the absence of an edit summary. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 49631] PageCuration isn't using section=new
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49631 --- Comment #4 from MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com --- Strange. I wonder why bug 46842 didn't resolve this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 49631] PageCuration isn't using section=new
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49631 --- Comment #5 from MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com --- (In reply to comment #3) The page is being edited using the api, for some reason (I should consult the original developers) there isn't any edit summary provided. Yeah, it's using action=edit in the MediaWiki API, but not section=new. I'm not sure why, but this should be simple enough to tweak. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 49631] PageCuration isn't using section=new
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49631 --- Comment #6 from MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com --- (In reply to comment #4) Strange. I wonder why bug 46842 didn't resolve this. This comment was intended for bug 49632, of course. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 49631] PageCuration isn't using section=new
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49631 --- Comment #7 from Nischay Nahata nischay...@gmail.com --- MZMcBride, could you please try to answer comment 1. More specifically, what difference would using section=new bring? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 49631] PageCuration isn't using section=new
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49631 --- Comment #8 from MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com --- (In reply to comment #7) MZMcBride, could you please try to answer comment 1. More specifically, what difference would using section=new bring? It would fix the edit summary. I'm not sure why there's any discussion needed here: you're adding a new section to the page. Is there any reason not to use section=new? This is why it exists. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 49631] PageCuration isn't using section=new
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49631 --- Comment #9 from Nischay Nahata nischay...@gmail.com --- PageTriage isn't adding any new section. Its just adding some wiki text which is made into a section by the template. Of course, PageTriage could/should add a edit summary while doing the edit. But its a separate thing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 49631] PageCuration isn't using section=new
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49631 --- Comment #10 from MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com --- (In reply to comment #9) PageTriage isn't adding any new section. Its just adding some wiki text which is made into a section by the template. What? PageTriage is using the MediaWiki API's action=edit module and is calling appendtext. It should instead be using section=new. This is the bug. When you're adding a new section to a talk page, use section=new. This is why it exists. https://git.wikimedia.org/blob/mediawiki%2Fextensions%2FPageTriage/4608051c1f48e8f5c69f5206498df4a7dddba17a/modules%2Fext.pageTriage.views.toolbar%2Fext.pageTriage.mark.js#L124 This posts to a talk page. Use section=new here. Of course, PageTriage could/should add a edit summary while doing the edit. But its a separate thing. It will automatically use a proper edit summary when section=new is specified. Use that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 49631] PageCuration isn't using section=new
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49631 --- Comment #11 from MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com --- Broadly, I think you're right. The symptom (and bug) here is the edit summary. The problem is the use of appendtext without specifying a summary parameter. The summary parameter is automatically filled in when section=new is used. An edit summary could be faked, but doing so would be kind of insane, in my opinion. That's why I filed this bug the way that I did. The edit summary is important to include, otherwise editors see edits to user talk pages and have no idea why they edited a particular user talk page. For example: 00:16, 16 June 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+395) . . User talk:Simsong (current) This should read: 00:16, 16 June 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+395) . . User talk:Simsong (A page you started (Digital Forensics XML) has been reviewed!) (current) Then I would know why I made a particular edit and so would everybody else. If you want to re-purpose the bug's summary to focus on edit summaries (the symptom) instead of not using section=new (what I consider to be the problem), I'm fine with that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
