[Bug 49784] VisualEditor: Transclusion nodes should re-evaluate their block/inline status on every update

2014-10-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49784 James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 49784] VisualEditor: Transclusion nodes should re-evaluate their block/inline status on every update

2014-10-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49784 Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 49784] VisualEditor: Transclusion nodes should re-evaluate their block/inline status on every update

2014-03-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49784 James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 49784] VisualEditor: Transclusion nodes should re-evaluate their block/inline status on every update

2013-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49784 James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |enhancement

[Bug 49784] VisualEditor: Transclusion nodes should re-evaluate their block/inline status on every update

2013-12-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49784 --- Comment #5 from Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com --- Parsoid says they now have a public wt2html API that we can use instead of action=parse. That would at least allow use to let Parsoid determine whether it is inline or block (instead of

[Bug 49784] VisualEditor: Transclusion nodes should re-evaluate their block/inline status on every update

2013-12-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49784 --- Comment #6 from Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #5) Parsoid says they now have a public wt2html API that we can use instead of action=parse. That would at least allow use to let Parsoid determine whether it is

[Bug 49784] VisualEditor: Transclusion nodes should re-evaluate their block/inline status on every update

2013-11-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49784 James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 49784] VisualEditor: Transclusion nodes should re-evaluate their block/inline status on every update

2013-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49784 James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 49784] VisualEditor: Transclusion nodes should re-evaluate their block/inline status on every update

2013-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49784 James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|VE-deploy-2013-10-03|--- -- You

[Bug 49784] VisualEditor: Transclusion nodes should re-evaluate their block/inline status on every update

2013-09-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49784 James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|VE-deploy-2013-09-26

[Bug 49784] VisualEditor: Transclusion nodes should re-evaluate their block/inline status on every update

2013-09-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49784 James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|VE-deploy-2013-09-19

[Bug 49784] VisualEditor: Transclusion nodes should re-evaluate their block/inline status on every update

2013-09-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49784 James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|VE-deploy-2013-09-12

[Bug 49784] VisualEditor: Transclusion nodes should re-evaluate their block/inline status on every update

2013-09-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49784 James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|VE-deploy-2013-09-05

[Bug 49784] VisualEditor: Transclusion nodes should re-evaluate their block/inline status on every update

2013-08-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49784 James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|VE-deploy-2013-08-29

[Bug 49784] VisualEditor: Transclusion nodes should re-evaluate their block/inline status on every update

2013-08-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49784 James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|---

[Bug 49784] VisualEditor: Transclusion nodes should re-evaluate their block/inline status on every update

2013-08-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49784 James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|roan.katt...@gmail.com

[Bug 49784] VisualEditor: Transclusion nodes should re-evaluate their block/inline status on every update

2013-07-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49784 Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 49784] VisualEditor: Transclusion nodes should re-evaluate their block/inline status on every update

2013-06-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49784 --- Comment #1 from Ed Sanders esand...@wikimedia.org --- Possible solution may involve removing distinction between block inline transclusion types in the DM, replacing with hybrid type, and have CE work out how to render it properly. --

[Bug 49784] VisualEditor: Transclusion nodes should re-evaluate their block/inline status on every update

2013-06-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49784 James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|Unprioritized |High