https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54290
--- Comment #12 from eikes leon.liese...@wikipedia.de ---
Any progress here?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54290
James Alexander jalexan...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|thehelpfulonew...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54290
James Alexander jalexan...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54290
Tomasz W. Kozlowski tom...@twkozlowski.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54290
--- Comment #9 from rschen7754.w...@gmail.com ---
Well, but without the archiving, this is simply a separate mailing address for
convenience. This would be used for internal discussion and not for taking
requests.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54290
--- Comment #10 from James Alexander jalexan...@wikimedia.org ---
note: No blocker from me, especially if it's a discussion list, mostly just
wanted to get my thoughts down trying to limit archiving as much as we can for
things like this.
--
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54290
--- Comment #8 from Trijnstel trijns...@hotmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Just checking in here (sorry for the delay, I'm out of the country and the
internet has been down for the past couple of days) - I'll allow James and
Trijnstel
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54290
Thehelpfulone thehelpfulonew...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54290
--- Comment #4 from James Alexander jalexan...@wikimedia.org ---
yes archiving publicly would be very bad ;)
Sorry for the delay:
I know oversight-l is not archived. I do not know for sure about the commons
list but, in general, if they get
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54290
--- Comment #5 from Trijnstel trijns...@hotmail.com ---
I don't quite get why this is needed I mean, the wikidata oversighters
already have an oversight-wikidata queue on OTRS. Why do you also need a
mailing list? For coordination? While
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54290
--- Comment #6 from rschen7754.w...@gmail.com ---
Jamesofur: if the English Wikipedia doesn't do it then I suppose that we can do
without it too, though we receive requests by OTRS anyway, which is searchable
(enwiki too)...
Trijnstel: I
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54290
rschen7754.w...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia. |thehelpfulonew...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54290
--- Comment #1 from James Alexander jalexan...@wikimedia.org ---
Leaving this for THO for now but just a comment: For legal reasons (given the
sensitivity of the content) please make sure to keep archives off both in the
initial setup and
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54290
--- Comment #2 from rschen7754.w...@gmail.com ---
I was under the impression that the other such lists (oversight-l on enwiki,
oversight-commons) were set up with archiving on - is that not the case?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54290
--- Comment #3 from rschen7754.w...@gmail.com ---
Archiving where only subscribers can see the content, of course :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54290
Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Normal
16 matches
Mail list logo
