https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61463
--- Comment #6 from Andre Klapper ---
(In reply to Adrian Lang from comment #5)
> Since 2.9, there is conflicts:, but we are on 2.8.
see bug 68271
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61463
Adrian Lang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adrian.l...@wikimedia.de
--- Comment #5
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61463
Nemo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61463
--- Comment #4 from Nemo ---
Thanks for commenting.
(In reply to christian from comment #3)
> I have no say here, but since we're heading Phabricator anyways, I do not
> think switching the search back-end is worth it at this point.
AFAIK the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61463
--- Comment #3 from christ...@quelltextlich.at ---
(In reply to Nemo from comment #0)
> Is this the infamous Lucene search?
Yes.
Gerrit's current search back-end gerrit uses is not great. Agreed.
But Gerrit's Lucene search back-end had it's o
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61463
Jan Zerebecki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jan.wikime...@zerebecki.de
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61463
Tisza Gergő changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gti...@wikimedia.org
--- Comment #1 from
