[Bug 61802] Use a different format for l10n_cache (or document why the current one is the best one)

2014-03-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61802 Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|Unprioritized |Low

[Bug 61802] Use a different format for l10n_cache (or document why the current one is the best one)

2014-02-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61802 Niklas Laxström niklas.laxst...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 61802] Use a different format for l10n_cache (or document why the current one is the best one)

2014-02-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61802 --- Comment #7 from Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it --- By the way, Toolserver has a special table for namespace names and I'm told Labs recently got such feature too. https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Toolserver_database -- You are receiving

[Bug 61802] Use a different format for l10n_cache (or document why the current one is the best one)

2014-02-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61802 --- Comment #8 from Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org --- (In reply to Niklas Laxström from comment #6) For definite answer you need to ask Tim who wrote the code. My guess is that it just followed the pattern of BagOStuff which serializes

[Bug 61802] Use a different format for l10n_cache (or document why the current one is the best one)

2014-02-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61802 --- Comment #9 from Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org --- (In reply to Nemo from comment #7) By the way, Toolserver has a special table for namespace names and I'm told Labs recently got such feature too.

[Bug 61802] Use a different format for l10n_cache (or document why the current one is the best one)

2014-02-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61802 --- Comment #10 from Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it --- (In reply to Oliver Keyes from comment #9) huh; interesting. Prrobably not directly applicable, because there's no direct connection betwixt the analytics machines and the toolserver dbs

[Bug 61802] Use a different format for l10n_cache (or document why the current one is the best one)

2014-02-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61802 --- Comment #11 from Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org --- (In reply to Nemo from comment #10) (In reply to Oliver Keyes from comment #9) huh; interesting. Prrobably not directly applicable, because there's no direct connection betwixt the

[Bug 61802] Use a different format for l10n_cache (or document why the current one is the best one)

2014-02-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61802 --- Comment #12 from Niklas Laxström niklas.laxst...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Oliver Keyes from comment #8) 2) WMF is using CDB files, no DB for l10n cache. Then why is the table there? It's a MediaWiki feature we don't use? Database

[Bug 61802] Use a different format for l10n_cache (or document why the current one is the best one)

2014-02-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61802 --- Comment #13 from Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org --- (In reply to Niklas Laxström from comment #12) Can you tell a bit more where do you need the namespaces? Are you parsing the wikitext? Doesn't for example pagelinks table have the

[Bug 61802] Use a different format for l10n_cache (or document why the current one is the best one)

2014-02-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61802 --- Comment #14 from Niklas Laxström niklas.laxst...@gmail.com --- Then I don't see any other solution currently other than 3) I mentioned. If you don't want to install MediaWiki on the analytics servers, the second best thing would be to

[Bug 61802] Use a different format for l10n_cache (or document why the current one is the best one)

2014-02-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61802 Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Internationalization|Database

[Bug 61802] Use a different format for l10n_cache (or document why the current one is the best one)

2014-02-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61802 --- Comment #5 from Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org --- (In reply to Nemo from comment #4) But we still lack a use case. One server in the world with DB but without API isn't really convincing. It's more than one server; it's going to be

[Bug 61802] Use a different format for l10n_cache (or document why the current one is the best one)

2014-02-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61802 Niklas Laxström niklas.laxst...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED

[Bug 61802] Use a different format for l10n_cache (or document why the current one is the best one)

2014-02-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61802 --- Comment #2 from Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org --- (In reply to Niklas Laxström from comment #1) Are you saying that the strings in the database are serialized? Indeed (or, at least, the arrays appear to be) -- You are receiving

[Bug 61802] Use a different format for l10n_cache (or document why the current one is the best one)

2014-02-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61802 Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever