https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
--- Comment #29 from Steinsplitter steinsplit...@wikipedia.de ---
Funny: Admins can restore pages, but not deleting it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
--- Comment #30 from John F. Lewis johnflewi...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Steinsplitter from comment #29)
Funny: Admins can restore pages, but not deleting it.
That is a new feature for MediaWiki and irrelevant of this bug.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
--- Comment #31 from Steinsplitter steinsplit...@wikipedia.de ---
(In reply to John F. Lewis from comment #30)
(In reply to Steinsplitter from comment #29)
Funny: Admins can restore pages, but not deleting it.
That is a new feature for
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
Steinsplitter steinsplit...@wikipedia.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
--- Comment #28 from Gerrit Notification Bot gerritad...@wikimedia.org ---
Change 142617 abandoned by Jackmcbarn:
Let sysops edit the GWToolset namespace on Commons
Reason:
6 weeks with no activity on the bug. If we ever do get consensus to do
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
jeremyb bugzilla+org.wikime...@tuxmachine.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|PATCH_TO_REVIEW |NEW
--
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
John F. Lewis johnflewi...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
Steinsplitter steinsplit...@wikipedia.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|community-consensus-needed |
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
Jackmcbarn jackmcbarn+w...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
--- Comment #4 from Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to Steinsplitter from comment #2)
minor change, not needed.
Hmm, is minor change in this case defined somewhere, or is this unwritten
common sense?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
--- Comment #5 from Steinsplitter steinsplit...@wikipedia.de ---
(In reply to Andre Klapper from comment #4)
(In reply to Steinsplitter from comment #2)
minor change, not needed.
Hmm, is minor change in this case defined somewhere, or is
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
John F. Lewis johnflewi...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
--- Comment #7 from Jackmcbarn jackmcbarn+w...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Jackmcbarn from comment #3)
Note that they wouldn't just be getting the ability to edit the namespace;
they would get full usage of GWToolset, just like any member
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
Steinsplitter steinsplit...@wikipedia.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|community-consensus-needed |
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
--- Comment #9 from Steinsplitter steinsplit...@wikipedia.de ---
(In reply to Jackmcbarn from comment #7)
(In reply to Jackmcbarn from comment #3)
Note that they wouldn't just be getting the ability to edit the namespace;
they would get
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
--- Comment #10 from Jackmcbarn jackmcbarn+w...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Steinsplitter from comment #9)
(In reply to Jackmcbarn from comment #7)
(In reply to Jackmcbarn from comment #3)
Note that they wouldn't just be getting the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
Tomasz W. Kozlowski twkozlow...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
--- Comment #12 from Didym didym.wikime...@gmail.com ---
actually, admins can create pages in the GWToolset namespace, as they can
restore pages (but neither edit nor delete them)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
--- Comment #13 from Bawolff (Brian Wolff) bawolff...@gmail.com ---
The GWToolset namespace is mostly used for saving mappings of xml -
wikitext. I don't see any reason why admins shouldn't be able to edit it
(Actually I'm kind of surprised
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
--- Comment #14 from Steinsplitter steinsplit...@wikipedia.de ---
Without word. To much bureaucracy. Why we need for a new beta tool communety
consensus. It is _completly_ nonsense.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
--- Comment #15 from Tisza Gergő gti...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to Jackmcbarn from comment #10)
I know how MediaWiki's permission system works. Without doing what I said,
we'd have to give admins access to all of GWToolset to do what you
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
--- Comment #16 from John F. Lewis johnflewi...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Steinsplitter from comment #14)
Without word. To much bureaucracy. Why we need for a new beta tool
communety consensus. It is _completly_ nonsense.
It is not
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
--- Comment #17 from Jackmcbarn jackmcbarn+w...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Tisza Gergő from comment #15)
(In reply to Jackmcbarn from comment #10)
I know how MediaWiki's permission system works. Without doing what I said,
we'd have to give
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
--- Comment #18 from Steinsplitter steinsplit...@wikipedia.de ---
(In reply to Tisza Gergő from comment #15)
(In reply to Jackmcbarn from comment #10)
I know how MediaWiki's permission system works. Without doing what I said,
we'd have to
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
--- Comment #19 from Steinsplitter steinsplit...@wikipedia.de ---
(In reply to Jackmcbarn from comment #17)
(In reply to Tisza Gergő from comment #15)
(In reply to Jackmcbarn from comment #10)
I know how MediaWiki's permission system
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
--- Comment #20 from Steinsplitter steinsplit...@wikipedia.de ---
(In reply to John F. Lewis from comment #16)
(In reply to Steinsplitter from comment #14)
Without word. To much bureaucracy. Why we need for a new beta tool
communety
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
--- Comment #21 from John F. Lewis johnflewi...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Steinsplitter from comment #20)
(In reply to John F. Lewis from comment #16)
(In reply to Steinsplitter from comment #14)
Without word. To much bureaucracy. Why
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
--- Comment #22 from Gerrit Notification Bot gerritad...@wikimedia.org ---
Change 142617 had a related patch set (by Jackmcbarn) published:
Let sysops edit the GWToolset namespace on Commons
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/142617
--
You are
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
Gerrit Notification Bot gerritad...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
--- Comment #23 from Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org ---
Steinsplitter: Read [[mw:Bug_management/Bugzilla_etiquette]], especially
Criticize ideas, not people. Some of your previous comments are crossing a
line by not assuming that people
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
--- Comment #24 from Steinsplitter steinsplit...@wikipedia.de ---
(In reply to Andre Klapper from comment #23)
Steinsplitter: Read [[mw:Bug_management/Bugzilla_etiquette]], especially
Criticize ideas, not people. Some of your previous
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
--- Comment #25 from Rainer Rillke @commons.wikimedia ril...@wikipedia.de ---
+1 to this change from my side.
It is not completely nonsense; it is following a process which has been used
for several years at the Foundation.
Maybe, if you
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
--- Comment #26 from Rainer Rillke @commons.wikimedia ril...@wikipedia.de ---
Forgot to prove V. which I herby do:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Bureaucrats%27_noticeboard/Archive_2#GW_Toolset_right
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67209
--- Comment #27 from Rainer Rillke @commons.wikimedia ril...@wikipedia.de ---
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Requests_for_comment/New_extensions
anyone is invited to improve that page and make it known
--
You are receiving this
34 matches
Mail list logo
