https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9584
Richard Guk richardg...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9584
Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|1.16|1.16.x
--
Configure
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9584
Dan Collins en.wp.s...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||en.wp.s...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9584
duplicate...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||csolive...@gmail.com
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9584
Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9584
--- Comment #5 from Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com 2009-11-26 14:07:43
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Frankly, I think onlyinclude is a quite strange feature, working a bit
different from the other tags. As I understand it,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9584
--- Comment #6 from P.Copp paul.copper...@googlemail.com 2009-11-26 14:20:45
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
I think this argument is wrong for two reasons. First, the onlyinclude tag is
inside a nowiki tag; stuff in nowiki tags should
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9584
--- Comment #7 from Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org 2009-11-26 22:06:53
UTC ---
The terminology in the bug summary is incorrect for the 1.12 parser. I went to
a lot of trouble to simulate the 1.11 handling of onlyinclude as closely as
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9584
--- Comment #8 from Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com 2009-11-26 22:32:46
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
The terminology in the bug summary is incorrect for the 1.12 parser. I went to
a lot of trouble to simulate the 1.11 handling of
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9584
P.Copp paul.copper...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
10 matches
Mail list logo
