https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17170
--- Comment #8 from Nikola Kovacs 2010-02-18 16:22:24
UTC ---
Actually, I was wrong, BacklinkCache:getLinks looks correct:
if ( $startId ) {
$conds[] = "$fromField >= " . intval( $startId );
}
if ( $endId ) {
$conds[] = "$fromField <=
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17170
Happy-melon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||happy-me...@live.com
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17170
--- Comment #6 from Nikola Kovacs 2010-02-18 15:33:57
UTC ---
While looking around in the code, I found out that in RefreshLinksJob2::run the
variable $start had a value equal to the article id that links to the template,
while $end was 0.
Be
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17170
Nikola Kovacs changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nx.devn...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 fr
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17170
--- Comment #4 from od_mish...@yahoo.com 2009-02-04 06:24:48 UTC ---
What would be a reasonable time frame for the queue to be completed?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are recei
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17170
--- Comment #3 from P.Copp 2009-02-03 11:01:22
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> In less than a minute, the Job Queue went down
> from 1.2 mil to 1 mil; this should mean that anything in the job queue should
> be gone within about 6 minu
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17170
--- Comment #2 from od_mish...@yahoo.com 2009-02-03 09:47:13 UTC ---
But should it take over a month? In less than a minute, the Job Queue went down
from 1.2 mil to 1 mil; this should mean that anything in the job queue should
be gone withi
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17170
^demon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||innocentkil...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 f
