[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2014-01-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829

Bartosz Dziewoński  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords|patch, patch-reviewed   |
 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 CC||matma@gmail.com
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX

--- Comment #44 from Bartosz Dziewoński  ---
WONTFIXing per Andre and per no response.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2013-07-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829

Andre Klapper  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||patch-reviewed
 CC||aklap...@wikimedia.org

--- Comment #43 from Andre Klapper  ---
Proposing WONTFIX - I don't see that setting border="1" is actually wanted
here.

In any case, this patch should go into Gerrit:
You are welcome to use Developer access
  https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Developer_access
to submit this as a Git branch directly into Gerrit:
  https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Git/Tutorial

Putting your branch in Git makes it easier to review it quickly.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829

--- Comment #42 from jida...@jidanni.org 2011-04-25 00:10:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #41)
> border=0 is redundant.  You don't need it to achieve that effect.
OK, but it makes things explicit, e.g., for Comment #10.
And I don't see why they insist on making it invalid, just to break
compatibility with HTML4.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829

--- Comment #41 from Aryeh Gregor  2011-04-24 
18:31:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #38)
> The semantic meaning of "border=1" is "this is definitely not a layout table,
> don't you dare treat it like one".  The semantic meaning of "border=0" is 
> "this
> *is* a layout table".

No, border=0 could be a non-layout table that you don't want to have a border
for whatever reason.  There are such things.  It doesn't have any semantic
meaning.  The semantic meaning for border=1 was made up by HTML5.

> The HTML5 spec deprecates layout tables even more
> strongly than its predecessors, and in particular indicates that they "must" 
> be
> marked with an attribute "role=presentation".

This is actually a point of divergence between the W3C and WHATWG copies: the
W3C allows role=presentation on tables, the WHATWG prohibits it.

http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/tabular-data.html#the-table-element
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/tabular-data.html#the-table-element

Not that it makes much difference, since both of them say role=presentation on
a table is valid.

(In reply to comment #39)
> Why take away people's ability to do the first of
> $ w3m -dump a.html
> a b
> 1 2

border=0 is redundant.  You don't need it to achieve that effect.

$ cat a.html


a b
c d

$ w3m -dump a.html
a b
c d

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829

--- Comment #40 from Happy-melon  2011-04-23 
22:03:56 UTC ---
Because the spec says that coding things in that fashion is undesirable and
deprecated and people should be discouraged from doing it.  I'm not necessarily
saying that I agree with that, but that's the position they're working from. 
The area that you're looking at is, to them, the loose ends of a much larger
issue; if you don't interact with them on that basis, you're just rearranging
deckchairs on the Titanic.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829

--- Comment #39 from jida...@jidanni.org 2011-04-23 21:43:25 UTC ---
Why take away people's ability to do the first of
$ w3m -dump a.html
a b
1 2
$ w3m -dump b.html
+---+
|a|b|
|-+-|
|1|2|
+---+

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829

--- Comment #38 from Happy-melon  2011-04-22 
22:24:32 UTC ---
The semantic meaning of "border=1" is "this is definitely not a layout table,
don't you dare treat it like one".  The semantic meaning of "border=0" is "this
*is* a layout table".  The HTML5 spec deprecates layout tables even more
strongly than its predecessors, and in particular indicates that they "must" be
marked with an attribute "role=presentation".  The "border=0" marker makes no
sense in the spec because it gives no additional data.  Now the OP of that bug
is correct to note that this tableless nirvana, while a worthy goal, is not
currently a feature of the web environment that HTML5 is being launched into,
but that bug (and W3C's perspective) is about interoperability between a new
standard and old websites.  There is no reason for new MediaWiki code to
support what will, if at all, be introduced as a deprecated feature ("users may
do X, but should not do so; UAs should interpret it as Y").  Rather, we should
be supporting the spec's positively-endorsed implementations (in this case,
preferably not using layout tables at all, and if we do, marking them with
"role=presentation".  There should never be a need to introduce deprecated
syntax, and so no reason for us to support it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829

--- Comment #37 from jida...@jidanni.org 2011-04-22 03:22:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #36)
> The spec now permits 
Thanks for the heads up.
Now we will see there on
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12413
if they can also figure out that they also need border="0",
Ah, tables,
"Just like mom used to make",
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_npZF7Ah6s8

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829

--- Comment #36 from Aryeh Gregor  2011-04-21 
17:34:17 UTC ---
The spec now permits :

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Apr/0377.html
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/tabular-data.html#attr-table-border

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829

--- Comment #35 from jida...@jidanni.org 2011-04-05 01:13:45 UTC ---
And how else can text browsers still distinguish which tables really don't want
borders, without implementing CSS?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829

--- Comment #34 from jida...@jidanni.org 2011-04-03 22:29:08 UTC ---
So then then why spitefully cause peoples pages who used it to become invalid?
And if they break this, what next will they spitefully break for no reason in
HTML6?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829

--- Comment #33 from Aryeh Gregor  2011-04-03 
22:08:43 UTC ---
Oops, didn't realize it was secret.  Obnoxious of them.  It's not really
secret, since anyone can apply to be an Invited Expert in the HTMLWG, but
whatever.  It will close tomorrow night, and the chairs will judge it within
the next few weeks.

(In reply to comment #32)
> please tell them to also allow border="0"!

What's the point of this?  Don't tables have no border by default?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829

--- Comment #32 from jida...@jidanni.org 2011-04-02 00:54:27 UTC ---
I don't think we common people are allowed to comment there.
Besides it is mostly over my head. However,
please tell them to also allow border="0"!
Stop pulling the rug out of people who want their HTML to work as intended in
both HTML4 and HTML5.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829

--- Comment #31 from jida...@jidanni.org 2011-04-02 00:34:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #30)
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/155 perhaps.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829

--- Comment #30 from Happy-melon  2011-04-01 
23:58:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> FWIW, the HTMLWG is currently debating the validity of this, under the name
> ISSUE-155.  There's a survey up now, which will close on Monday, and the 
> chairs
> will likely make a decision within a few weeks:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-155-objection-poll/

That link is under an http_auth wall, for me at least.  Is there a public link?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829

--- Comment #29 from Aryeh Gregor  2011-04-01 
22:19:14 UTC ---
FWIW, the HTMLWG is currently debating the validity of this, under the name
ISSUE-155.  There's a survey up now, which will close on Monday, and the chairs
will likely make a decision within a few weeks:

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-155-objection-poll/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2010-09-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829

Rodan BURY  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords|accessibility   |
 CC||bury.ro...@gmail.com

--- Comment #28 from Rodan BURY  2010-09-16 19:51:56 UTC 
---
I removed the "accessibility" keyword since this is by no means an
accessibility issue. Maybe an interoperability issue.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2009-08-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829





--- Comment #27 from Aryeh Gregor   2009-08-19 
21:43:43 UTC ---
Seems like a minor enough issue that we may as well stick with what the
standard says, which is also fewer bytes/more elegant.  We don't produce many
tables in the actual software that anyone would be interested in copying, do
we?  I'd expect people mostly copy infoboxes and such.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2009-08-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829


Brion Vibber  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||br...@wikimedia.org
 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|WONTFIX |




--- Comment #26 from Brion Vibber   2009-08-19 20:27:11 
UTC ---
Reopening now that there's actually some visible result under discussion.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2009-08-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829


Brion Vibber  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Add border="1" to tables,   |Tables without explicit
   |not just their stylesheets  |border attributes lose
   ||border styles when cut-and-
   ||pasted




--- Comment #25 from Brion Vibber   2009-08-19 20:02:06 
UTC ---
Clarifying subject.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l