https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22808
Jan Zerebecki jan.wikime...@zerebecki.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|PATCH_TO_REVIEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22808
--- Comment #5 from Gerrit Notification Bot gerritad...@wikimedia.org ---
Change 65828 merged by Aaron Schulz:
(bug 22808) Don't count expensive calls for cached titles
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/65828
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22808
Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|patch-in-gerrit |
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22808
--- Comment #4 from Gerrit Notification Bot gerritad...@wikimedia.org ---
Related URL: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/65828 (Gerrit Change
Ie4dd9fd647dc79a2b31bc44ef8b6a641b54cfb78)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22808
Liangent liang...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch-in-gerrit
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22808
Platonides platoni...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||platoni...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22808
--- Comment #2 from Malafaya malaf...@clix.pt 2010-03-11 18:52:23 UTC ---
All right.
So, it means they are already using a cache but still being considered as
expensive.
In that case, just the expensive call counter needs no update.
--
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22808
--- Comment #3 from Platonides platoni...@gmail.com 2010-03-11 22:03:04 UTC
---
Right. Although it may be tricky, since the cache is at a lower level thabn
parserfunctions.
--
Configure bugmail:
