https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24854
Mark A. Hershberger m...@everybody.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2
--
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24854
Derk-Jan Hartman hart...@videolan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24854
Bawolff bawolff...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krinklem...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24854
Derk-Jan Hartman hart...@videolan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24854
--- Comment #1 from Derk-Jan Hartman hart...@videolan.org 2010-08-18 18:44:19
CEST ---
This version is fixed with a newer ImageMagick or newer libjpeg version.
I run:
Version: ImageMagick 6.5.9-9 2010-05-05 Q16 http://www.imagemagick.org
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24854
Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24854
--- Comment #3 from Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org 2010-08-18 17:40:57
UTC ---
I was referring to the ImageMagick used by our thumbnailing servers in case it
was not clear.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24854
--- Comment #4 from Derk-Jan Hartman hart...@videolan.org 2010-08-18 23:49:37
CEST ---
No, this upload was from today. It is not related to our upgrade.
There might be other causes of course. It could be an error in libjpeg or in
the
