[Bug 26045] Switch CodeReview to use LiquidThreads (tracking)

2013-11-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon 
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26045

MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||b...@mzmcbride.com

--- Comment #4 from MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com ---
In addition to a lack of support for LiquidThreads, the CodeReview MediaWiki
extension has been abandoned in favor of using Gerrit for Wikimedia wikis,
adding to the reasons that this bug will never be fixed.

(tangentially...)

It may be difficult to believe, but Gerrit's discussion system is actually
worse than LiquidThreads' (and Bugzilla's). That said, Gerrit's discussion
system has shown some improvement over the past year; for example, it no longer
collapses comments so aggressively. It's still fairly hostile to collaboration,
however.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

[Bug 26045] Switch CodeReview to use LiquidThreads (tracking)

2013-11-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon 
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26045

Jack Phoenix j...@countervandalism.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 CC||j...@countervandalism.net
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Summary|Switch CR to use LQT|Switch CodeReview to use
   |(tracking)  |LiquidThreads (tracking)

--- Comment #3 from Jack Phoenix j...@countervandalism.net ---
Having CodeReview support multiple commenting backends (i.e.
[[mw:Extension:Comments]], LiquidThreads, etc.) would be nice. However, that's
not a high priority since the current system works well enough.

Additionally, this bug will never (or at least in the forseeable future) be
fixed as-is, because the current version of LiquidThreads is no longer
actively maintained (as per
https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Extension:LiquidThreadsoldid=794592)
and it has plenty of open bugs, and the planned new version, 3.0, is on hold
or canceled (as per
https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=LiquidThreads_3.0oldid=647230).
Therefore it doesn't seem beneficial to switch a working, albeit simplistic,
backend to something that has many known issues and no-one to actively (try to)
resolve said issues.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l