https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26266
Summary: Add .allpagesredirect, .redirect-in-category to standard CSS Product: MediaWiki Version: 1.17-svn Platform: All URL: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/mediawiki-l/2010- December/036070.html OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: accessibility Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: Redirects AssignedTo: wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org ReportedBy: jida...@jidanni.org Why in the world isn't the .allpagesredirect, .redirect-in-category stuff mentioned in the above URL part of the standard CSS? Why must administrators have to add it for their own wiki? If there are some cases where it causes problems then they must be the minority, and those administrators can customize it back out. Searching for allpagesredirect and redirect-in-category here in bugzilla shows many reports... Too many to add to depends/blocks today for me. Now most of the work that those reports requested is done except for the very last piece, adding them to the standard distribution stylesheets, please! Why is it good for Wikimedia but not for Mediawiki? Are there other cases like this where something was implemented for Wikipedia/Wikimedia, then forgotten about for Mediawiki? By the way, as mentioned in a second article, http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/mediawiki-l/2010-December/036064.html , Why isn't this implemented with <em> so it works in text browsers too? Why is accessibility usually respected but not here? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l