https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
--- Comment #26 from Erwin Dokter 2012-01-18 19:45:26 UTC
---
Permanent checkered background:
#file img {
/* @embed */
background: white
url(//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5d/Checker-16x16.png) repeat;
}
Reverse hover:
#
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
Saibo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||saibotr...@arcor.de
--- Comment #25 from Saibo
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
Ashar Voultoiz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
--- Comment #23 from MZMcBride 2011-09-03 03:48:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> (In reply to comment #20)
>> /*
>> * Add a checkered background image on hover for file description pages.
>> */
>> .filehistory a img,
>> #file img:hover
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
--- Comment #22 from Krinkle 2011-07-31 05:59:45 UTC ---
Looks good to me.
People who only need to know "if" an image is transparent can either scroll
down or hover the image, and for more precision the hover on the main image on
the descripti
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
Krinkle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|easy|
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wik
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
--- Comment #21 from DieBuche 2011-07-27 12:05:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> /*
> * Add a checkered background image on hover for file description pages.
> */
> .filehistory a img,
> #file img:hover {
> /* @embed */
> backgro
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
--- Comment #20 from Erwin Dokter 2011-07-09 17:49:52 UTC
---
I wa thinking more about a static bar above the image, not the kind that pops
up like in IE.
I know what the C stands for. The reason why it may not work is because local
CSS overr
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
--- Comment #19 from Bawolff 2011-07-09 01:53:52 UTC ---
>AFAIK it's hard to impossible (maybe using canvas?) to detect whether an image
>has an alpha channel via JS.
>And showing the toolbar on every non-transparent image is rather irritating
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
--- Comment #18 from Erwin Dokter 2011-07-08 23:39:38 UTC
---
I had not considered that.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
--- Comment #17 from DieBuche 2011-07-08 23:00:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Reverted in r91761, therefor reopened.
>
> As Krinkle commented, we need to flesh out how this should be done. Since many
> sites already have transparency s
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
Erwin Dokter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
Krinkle changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia. |diebu...@gmail.com
|org
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
DieBuche changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
DieBuche changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||diebu...@gmail.com
AssignedTo|wikib
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
--- Comment #13 from Erwin Dokter 2011-05-20 23:17:00 UTC
---
On second thought, I'm not so sure if adding yet more preferences is good
thing.
It seems the hover toggle is the way to go. (Not on galleries though, just the
main image; enwiki u
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
--- Comment #12 from Mark A. Hershberger 2011-02-17
15:11:20 UTC ---
*** Bug 27458 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
Mark A. Hershberger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||raimond.spekk...@gmail.com
--- C
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
--- Comment #10 from Platonides 2011-02-08 23:30:25 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Alternatively, if this would fragment cache (not sure if it does, I don't
> expect it will)
It wouldn't.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
--- Comment #9 from Erwin Dokter 2011-02-03 02:08:16 UTC ---
Are galleries and categories subject of this discussion? I was under the
impression that only the main image on an image description page should be
toggled.
--
Configure bugmail: ht
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
Krinkle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krinklem...@gmail.com
--- Comment #8 from Kr
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
Waldir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wal...@email.com
--- Comment #7 from Waldir
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
Erwin Dokter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||er...@darcoury.nl
--- Comment #6 from E
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
--- Comment #5 from p858snake 2011-01-31 07:07:48 UTC ---
Probably wouldn't be that hard with some jquery magic to add some css
(background image) onto the div...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
Ashar Voultoiz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--
Configure bugmail: https://bu
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
MZMcBride changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Add checkered background to |Add toggle for checkered or
26 matches
Mail list logo
