https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27618
Ángel González changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||keis...@gmail.com
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27618
--- Comment #8 from Ariel T. Glenn 2011-11-14 15:23:35
UTC ---
Out of curiosity, what do the various bz2 offline readers need, byte, or byte
and bit, or bzip2 boundary and offset?
I expect the offline readers don't really use namespace or p
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27618
Diederik van Liere changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dvanli...@gmail.com
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27618
Sumana Harihareswara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||need-review
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27618
--- Comment #4 from Adam Wight 2011-03-18 06:45:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 8310
--> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=8310
ROUGH
Not much to show yet, but in case someone wants to lend a hand...
My intention is that:
* each
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27618
--- Comment #3 from Adam Wight 2011-02-23 00:16:44 UTC ---
Interesting--
Also, the byte offsets are into the compressed data of course, ftell(STDOUT),
and the boundaries between bz2 chunks also becomes very relevant.
Thanks, I'll have a patch
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27618
--- Comment #2 from Ariel T. Glenn 2011-02-23 00:12:29
UTC ---
How will this work for runs that do parts in parallel? I still don't know if
those pieces should be recombined later but at present we are running on the
assumption that they shou
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27618
Mark A. Hershberger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Normal |High
CC|
