https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28260
--- Comment #1 from Yaron Koren yaro...@gmail.com 2011-03-27 17:10:31 UTC ---
Can you list some other ways you'd like to be able to use field values within
the form, besides setting whether or not another field is mandatory? I'd like
to get a
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28260
--- Comment #2 from John McClure jmccl...@hypergrove.com 2011-03-27 21:06:53
UTC ---
Sure.
First of all, it's fair to say that ontologies can easily have hundreds if not
thousands of categories. As you well know the OWL world maps its classes
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28260
--- Comment #3 from Yaron Koren yaro...@gmail.com 2011-03-27 21:28:35 UTC ---
Okay... I think you could have just said, set text in the form based on a
field value and left it at that, but thanks. :) By the way, if what you
describe as the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28260
--- Comment #4 from John McClure jmccl...@hypergrove.com 2011-03-27 21:57:10
UTC ---
As a consequence certain templates can be eliminated altogether, eg
the annoyingly simple templates that do nothing but {{#set}} values:
{{{for
