https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4740
--- Comment #27 from C. Scott Ananian canan...@wikimedia.org ---
A related use case: allows Parsoid to handle arbitrary table markup in WTS
phase.
Although my proposal (for the record) would be *not* to add new
pipes-and-punctuation markup for
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4740
--- Comment #28 from Michael Zajac mich...@zajac.ca ---
(In reply to Gabriel Wicke from comment #26)
1) allows for more sophisticated formatting (comment 1)
The main reason I requested this is the ability for an editor to create
multiple row
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4740
--- Comment #29 from Michael Zajac mich...@zajac.ca ---
(In reply to C. Scott Ananian from comment #27)
Once your table is sufficiently complicated, it's probably best to use
literal HTML, IMO.
But grouping table rows is a very simple
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4740
--- Comment #30 from C. Scott Ananian canan...@wikimedia.org ---
@Michael Zajac: nothing related to table parsing in wikitext is simple,
unfortunately. So I'm suggesting to concentrate on *making it possible*, and
let the template authors
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4740
--- Comment #31 from Michael Zajac mich...@zajac.ca ---
@C. Scott Ananian I do appreciate that the parsing and programming are likely
very complex. And also that white-flagging the HTML is a good improvement and
probably a step towards creating
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4740
--- Comment #32 from Brad Jorsch bjor...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to C. Scott Ananian from comment #30)
If someone would like
to open a new wikipage proposing concrete dead-simple wikitext syntax for
these, I'd be happy to re-evaluate.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4740
--- Comment #33 from C. Scott Ananian canan...@wikimedia.org ---
@Brad -- yes, I thought about mentioning that, but reconsidered; I thought it
would probably be more useful to stage a draft in some user's talk space (or
similar) first and let
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4740
--- Comment #26 from Gabriel Wicke gwi...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to Andy Mabbett from comment #24)
Gabriel: The use case is out lined in Michael Zajac's initial post
(timestamp: 2006-01-24 02:41:52); and in comments 4 11. Do you have
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4740
--- Comment #24 from Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk ---
Gabriel: The use case is out lined in Michael Zajac's initial post (timestamp:
2006-01-24 02:41:52); and in comments 4 11. Do you have questions about
those?
It appeared from
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4740
--- Comment #25 from Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk ---
Also, the heuristic suggested above won't work, as it's necessary to allow for
more than one tbody per table.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4740
Gabriel Wicke gwi...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4740
James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Normal |Low
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4740
--- Comment #21 from Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk ---
Can we get an update, please?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4740
--- Comment #22 from Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org ---
Nobody is currently working on this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4740
--- Comment #20 from Michael Zajac mich...@zajac.ca ---
So when the patch is implement, what syntax would I use to divide a table into
two or more row groups using tbody elements? This is not clear from the
descriptions above.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4740
mybugs.m...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4740
--- Comment #19 from mybugs.m...@gmail.com 2012-09-15 17:44:15 UTC ---
Hmm... r85922 was reverted on r97145 and
we do not have any of thead, tbody or tfoot at
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4740
DieBuche diebu...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4740
Nux e...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e...@wp.pl
--- Comment #16 from Nux
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4740
Michael Zajac mich...@zajac.ca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||10467
--
Configure
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4740
DieBuche diebu...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #7912|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4740
--- Comment #13 from DieBuche diebu...@gmail.com 2010-12-14 17:27:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 7911
-- https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=7911
a structural method to implement structural elements: tbody, thead and tfoot
v2
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4740
DieBuche diebu...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #7911|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4740
DieBuche diebu...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@paul-robinson.us
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4740
Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
25 matches
Mail list logo
