[Bug 53512] Support 'ondiscussionpage:' for LQT compatibility
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53512 Chad H. innocentkil...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #10 from Chad H. innocentkil...@gmail.com --- We're not going to implement this for Cirrus. Flow will have Cirrus integration. We should use Flow instead. lsearchd will probably be running as secondary for awhile still so the search won't disappear immediately. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 53512] Support 'ondiscussionpage:' for LQT compatibility
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53512 --- Comment #8 from Nik Everett neverett+bugzi...@wikimedia.org --- Does this still matter? Are we still using this feature? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 53512] Support 'ondiscussionpage:' for LQT compatibility
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53512 --- Comment #9 from Alex Monk kren...@gmail.com --- Yes. As far as I can remember it's still used when you submit an LQT search form. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 53512] Support 'ondiscussionpage:' for LQT compatibility
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53512 Nik Everett neverett+bugzi...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|Normal |Low --- Comment #7 from Nik Everett neverett+bugzi...@wikimedia.org --- Lowering importance as we don't have plans to remove Lucene search from production for a while, even for wikis that are using CirrusSearch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 53512] Support 'ondiscussionpage:' for LQT compatibility
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53512 Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it changed: What|Removed |Added CC||federicol...@tiscali.it Summary|Support 'ondiscussionpage:' |Support 'ondiscussionpage:' |for LQT compatability |for LQT compatibility Severity|normal |enhancement -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 53512] Support 'ondiscussionpage:' for LQT compatibility
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53512 Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|Unprioritized |Low -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 53512] Support 'ondiscussionpage:' for LQT compatibility
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53512 Nik Everett neverett+bugzi...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|Low |Normal --- Comment #4 from Nik Everett neverett+bugzi...@wikimedia.org --- Whether or not the UI is good not having this would still break a feature in mediawiki.org. I'm raising the priority back to normal as this blocks switching to the primary search backend for mediawiki.org, imho. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 53512] Support 'ondiscussionpage:' for LQT compatibility
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53512 --- Comment #5 from Alex Monk kren...@gmail.com --- Well, I made Gerrit change 81601 so that LQT can survive the default changeover. But this is needed before Lucene can be removed from WMF production. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 53512] Support 'ondiscussionpage:' for LQT compatibility
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53512 Jesús Martínez Novo (Ciencia Al Poder) martinezn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||martinezn...@gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Jesús Martínez Novo (Ciencia Al Poder) martinezn...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #3) Honestly its pretty useless on LQT. In my experiance the feature causes more problems then its worth due to the horrid UI. Some sites (Wikinews) use css to hide the search bar entirely due to spam resulting from this feature. That's because of bug 37801 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
