https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58683
--- Comment #20 from Tomasz W. Kozlowski ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> You mean that people from the team engaged and provided a lengthy and
> rigorous explanation as to why things are the way they are? I'd hope so, yes.
They did?
> In the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58683
--- Comment #19 from Oliver Keyes ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> Well, at least it is now clear that it's a WONTFIX and not an INVALID.
>
> It tells something about the attitude that's so often shown when it comes to
> all things Flow.
You m
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58683
--- Comment #18 from Tomasz W. Kozlowski ---
Well, at least it is now clear that it's a WONTFIX and not an INVALID.
It tells something about the attitude that's so often shown when it comes to
all things Flow.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58683
Andre Klapper changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||q...@wikimedia.org
--- Comment #17 fro
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58683
--- Comment #16 from Eduard Braun ---
Oh come on! Since when are you WMF guys meant to be sticklers for principles?
You're not exactly sustaining a productive environment with actions like these!
Fact is, that essentially *every* text element
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58683
Nemo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accessibility
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58683
--- Comment #15 from Bawolff (Brian Wolff) ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> "If you're not going to fix it mark it WONTFIX, but INVALID is for
> viagra advertisements..."
>
> Err, since when? :) This bug report doesn't pertain exclusively to F
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58683
Technical 13 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||technical...@yahoo.com
Resoluti
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58683
Maryana Pinchuk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58683
Oliver Keyes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58683
--- Comment #12 from Bawolff (Brian Wolff) ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > The way this bug is formatted is not actionable: "use black font wherever
> > possible" is not a clear issue that can be fixed/not fixed.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58683
Jack Phoenix changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58683
Maryana Pinchuk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58683
--- Comment #9 from Marcin Cieślak ---
When planning color scheme you also need to take into account appropriate
contrast between link text and non-link text, including active and visited
elements. So, link text needs to contrast not only again
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58683
Bawolff (Brian Wolff) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bawolff...@gmail.com
--- Comme
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58683
--- Comment #7 from Marcin Cieślak ---
I think Jared is saying to things:
1) He does not want to use black for normal text because he could be using real
black for some form of emphasis;
2) He believes that #666 on #fff is still okay, because
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58683
--- Comment #6 from Tomasz W. Kozlowski ---
@Jared: I read your comment, but I have no idea what it means.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58683
--- Comment #5 from Jared Zimmerman (WMF) ---
Hello all, while readability is rather subjective depending on eyesight,
brightness of screen, environmental conditions, screen type, etc.
Books aren't a great example since they aren't backlit, a
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58683
--- Comment #4 from Bartosz Dziewoński ---
Yes please, nothing brighter than #444 for text. Dark greys on light beige
backgrounds do sometimes look better than pure black on pure white, but we need
to consider the contrast carefully if we try t
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58683
--- Comment #3 from Oliver Keyes ---
I agree. Gmail uses black, facebook uses black, linkedin uses black, loomio
uses black, wordpress (by default) uses black. This is not a coincidence. I'd
really love to see the supporting evidence for dark-g
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58683
Eduard Braun changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eduard.bra...@gmx.de
--- Comment #2 fro
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58683
--- Comment #1 from Bingle ---
The WMF core features team tracks this bug on Mingle card
https://mingle.corp.wikimedia.org/projects/flow/cards/639, but people from the
community are welcome to contribute here and in Gerrit.
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58683
Tomasz W. Kozlowski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Normal
--
You are receiving thi
23 matches
Mail list logo
