https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60412
--- Comment #7 from MZMcBride ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Is there a way to see the members of the ldap/wmf group?
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/wmf-20140124.txt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60412
--- Comment #6 from MZMcBride ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Thanks for the clarification!
> Rephrase this: any full time WMF engineer is entitled to access to the
> ldap/wmf group (ops has +2 on all repos).
Is there a way to see the members o
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60412
--- Comment #5 from Chad H. ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > As I understand it, any Wikimedia Foundation employee can +2 code in Gerrit.
> > This is a flawed design and should be corrected.
>
> Rephrase this: any fu
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60412
--- Comment #4 from Chad H. ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> As I understand it, any Wikimedia Foundation employee can +2 code in Gerrit.
> This is a flawed design and should be corrected.
Rephrase this: any full time WMF engineer is entitled to
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60412
--- Comment #3 from MZMcBride ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Gerrit is a flawed design.
Perhaps, but it's the current code review tool. :-)
Further information about the technical details behind the current
implementation would be really help
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60412
--- Comment #2 from Dan Garry ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> As I understand it, any Wikimedia Foundation employee can +2 code in Gerrit.
> This is a flawed design and should be corrected.
Not automatically. I can't +2 code. Not that I actuall
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60412
Chad H. changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christ...@quelltextlich.at,
