[Bug 61729] Remove Flow from Meta-Wiki

2014-03-12 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 --- Comment #21 from Gerrit Notification Bot gerritad...@wikimedia.org --- Change 115412 abandoned by Odder: Remove Flow from Meta-Wiki Reason: This is very unlikely to ever be merged. https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/115412 -- You are

[Bug 61729] Remove Flow from Meta-Wiki

2014-03-12 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 Tomasz W. Kozlowski tom...@twkozlowski.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|PATCH_TO_REVIEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 61729] Remove Flow from Meta-Wiki

2014-03-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 --- Comment #20 from Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org --- I interpret comments 13 to 17 as WONTFIX for this request. Are there any further arguments that have not been brought up yet plus need answers? -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 61729] Remove Flow from Meta-Wiki

2014-02-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 Maryana Pinchuk mpinc...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug 61729] Remove Flow from Meta-Wiki

2014-02-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 Tomasz W. Kozlowski tom...@twkozlowski.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug 61729] Remove Flow from Meta-Wiki

2014-02-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 --- Comment #11 from Gerrit Notification Bot gerritad...@wikimedia.org --- Change 115412 had a related patch set uploaded by Odder: Remove Flow from Meta https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/115412 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 61729] Remove Flow from Meta-Wiki

2014-02-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 Gerrit Notification Bot gerritad...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED

[Bug 61729] Remove Flow from Meta-Wiki

2014-02-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 --- Comment #12 from Tomasz W. Kozlowski tom...@twkozlowski.net --- (In reply to Maryana Pinchuk from comment #9) We are not going to disable Flow from Meta unless there is an actual issue with the software. Please do not reopen this bug

[Bug 61729] Remove Flow from Meta-Wiki

2014-02-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||e...@wikimedia.org

[Bug 61729] Remove Flow from Meta-Wiki

2014-02-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 --- Comment #14 from MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com --- (In reply to Erik Moeller from comment #13) We can't get consensus on a per-wiki basis before enabling any software change. That has never been our practice and never will be. Nobody is

[Bug 61729] Remove Flow from Meta-Wiki

2014-02-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 --- Comment #15 from Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org --- I think everyone agrees that the communication about the single-page test wasn't sufficient. But I don't think the LQT comparison is valid. LQT comes with a rather scary per-page flag

[Bug 61729] Remove Flow from Meta-Wiki

2014-02-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 --- Comment #16 from MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com --- (In reply to Erik Moeller from comment #15) What practical concerns are there with the current test page deploy? I think you and I may fundamentally disagree about whether pissing off a

[Bug 61729] Remove Flow from Meta-Wiki

2014-02-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 --- Comment #17 from Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org --- Yeah, sure - I agree there's no point pissing off people unnecessarily while we're looking at different test scenarios. There's also no point creating more drama than required about a

[Bug 61729] Remove Flow from Meta-Wiki

2014-02-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 --- Comment #18 from p858snake p858sn...@gmail.com --- Where does the single page test end, and using it as a backdoor to enabling it wider or sitewide without community consensus -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee

[Bug 61729] Remove Flow from Meta-Wiki

2014-02-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 --- Comment #19 from Amgine amgine.sae...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Erik Moeller from comment #17) Yeah, sure - I agree there's no point pissing off people unnecessarily while we're looking at different test scenarios. There's also no point

[Bug 61729] Remove Flow from Meta-Wiki

2014-02-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 Tomasz W. Kozlowski tom...@twkozlowski.net changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|Unprioritized |Normal --

[Bug 61729] Remove Flow from Meta-Wiki

2014-02-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|Normal |High ---

[Bug 61729] Remove Flow from Meta-Wiki

2014-02-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 Bawolff (Brian Wolff) bawolff...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 61729] Remove Flow from Meta-Wiki

2014-02-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 --- Comment #3 from Bawolff (Brian Wolff) bawolff...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Bawolff (Brian Wolff) from comment #2) (Surely flow should add a page property or something to flow pages so that they can be found sanely?) Filed as bug 61747

[Bug 61729] Remove Flow from Meta-Wiki

2014-02-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 Maryana Pinchuk mpinc...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 61729] Remove Flow from Meta-Wiki

2014-02-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 Tomasz W. Kozlowski tom...@twkozlowski.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug 61729] Remove Flow from Meta-Wiki

2014-02-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 sp...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sp...@wikimedia.org --- Comment

[Bug 61729] Remove Flow from Meta-Wiki

2014-02-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 --- Comment #7 from Bawolff (Brian Wolff) bawolff...@gmail.com --- (In reply to spage from comment #6) Enabling Flow on a wiki test page before enabling it on a requested Talk page on that wiki is clearly the right thing to do. We found a

[Bug 61729] Remove Flow from Meta-Wiki

2014-02-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 --- Comment #8 from MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com --- (In reply to Maryana Pinchuk from comment #4) This is all following along our course of enabling Flow on an opt-in, user requested basis on a limited set of pages for testing purposes over

[Bug 61729] Remove Flow from Meta-Wiki

2014-02-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||shell -- You are