[Bug 62405] Documentation for inheritClass has broken example

2014-03-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62405 James Forrester changed: What|Removed |Added Status|PATCH_TO_REVIEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 62405] Documentation for inheritClass has broken example

2014-03-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62405 --- Comment #3 from Gerrit Notification Bot --- Change 117479 merged by jenkins-bot: inheritClass: Use Class.super instead of this.constructor.super https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/117479 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 62405] Documentation for inheritClass has broken example

2014-03-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62405 Gerrit Notification Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|PATCH_TO_REVIEW -- You are

[Bug 62405] Documentation for inheritClass has broken example

2014-03-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62405 --- Comment #2 from Gerrit Notification Bot --- Change 117479 had a related patch set uploaded by Krinkle: inheritClass: Use Class.super instead of this.constructor.super https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/117479 -- You are receiving this mail b

[Bug 62405] Documentation for inheritClass has broken example

2014-03-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62405 --- Comment #1 from Krinkle --- Ah, of course. Though "super" allows avoiding harcoding of the parent's class name, it does require you to reference the "current" class name as it otherwise will indeed never resolve. Proper syntax is: > funct

[Bug 62405] Documentation for inheritClass has broken example

2014-03-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62405 James Forrester changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|Unprioritized |Normal Status|NEW