Hi!
On 6/25/19 11:17 PM, Ariel Glenn WMF wrote:
> I think the issue is with the 0624 json dumps, which do seem a lot
> smaller than previous weeks' runs.
Ah, true, I didn't realize that. I think this may be because of that
dumpJson.php issue, which is now fixed. Maybe rerun the dump?
--
Stas Ma
I think the issue is with the 0624 json dumps, which do seem a lot smaller
than previous weeks' runs.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 8:22 AM Stas Malyshev
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Which script, please, and which dump? (The conversation was not
> > forwarded so I don't have the context.)
>
> Sorry, the origin
Hoi,
The performance of the query update is getting worse. Questions about this
have been raised before. I do remember quality replies like it is not
exponential so there is no problem. However, here we are and there is a
problem.
The problem is that I run batch jobs, batch jobs that do not run [1
Hi!
> Which script, please, and which dump? (The conversation was not
> forwarded so I don't have the context.)
Sorry, the original complaint was:
> I apologize if I missed something, but why the current JSON dump size
is ~25GB while a week ago it was ~58GB? (see
https://dumps.wikimedia.org/wiki
Which script, please, and which dump? (The conversation was not forwarded
so I don't have the context.)
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 3:39 AM Stas Malyshev
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Follow-up: according to my processing script, this dump contains
> > only 30280591 entries, while the main page is still advert
Hi!
> Follow-up: according to my processing script, this dump contains
> only 30280591 entries, while the main page is still advertising 57M+
> data items.
> Isn't it a bug in the dump process?
There was a problem with dump script (since fixed), so the dump may
indeed be broken. CCing Ariel to ta
Follow-up: according to my processing script, this dump contains
only 30280591 entries, while the main page is still advertising 57M+ data
items.
Isn't it a bug in the dump process?
Regards,
Vladimir
пн, 24 июн. 2019 г. в 19:37, Vladimir Ryabtsev :
> Hello,
>
> I apologize if I missed something,
On Jun 20, 2019, at 08:37 AM, Adam Sanchez wrote:
>
> For your information
>
> ...
> b) It took 43 hours to load the Wikidata RDF dump
> (wikidata-20190610-all-BETA.ttl, 383G) in the dev version of Virtuoso
> 07.20.3230.
> I had to patch Virtuoso because it was given the following error each
> t
On Jun 17, 2019, at 03:41 PM, Finn Aarup Nielsen wrote:
>
>
> Changing the subject a bit:
Well... Changing the subject a *lot*, to an extent probably
worthy of its own subject line, and an entirely new thread,
not only because it seems more relevant to the "shex-simple
Toolforge tool" you re
