Re: [Wikidata] [Analytics] [Wiki-Medicine] Zika

We do have more work in progress to extend the 2014 paper, in particular to mosquito-borne diseases in a Spanish-speaking country, though not Zika because there is insufficient data history. I appreciate the pointer. Are there any specific questions folks would like me to address in this

Re: [Wikidata] [Analytics] [Wiki-Medicine] Zika

Dear all, we're currently building a template for Zika-related articles (cf. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Zika ), and I could imagine some of these - e.g. those on the earlier Zika outbreaks - may be useful for training the models. Cheers, Daniel On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:11 PM,

Re: [Wikidata] [Analytics] [Wiki-Medicine] Zika

Thanks, Reid. When you say there's insufficient data history, do you mean in other sources? Zika was discovered in 1947 and the wiki page for it was built in 2009. We have high quality geolocated data since May 2015. I'm still doing research (I admit the distractions at the foundation have

Re: [Wikidata] [Analytics] [Wiki-Medicine] Zika

I pointed Reid and his team to this thread. On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 12:07 AM, Alex Druk wrote: > My 2¢: http://www.wikipediatrends.com/predictions/Medicine/Zika_virus/ > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Dan Andreescu > wrote: > >> This makes a

Re: [Wikidata] [Analytics] [Wiki-Medicine] Zika

My 2¢: http://www.wikipediatrends.com/predictions/Medicine/Zika_virus/ On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Dan Andreescu wrote: > This makes a lot of sense, I'll get started on looking for correlation > between that time-line and geolocated interest coming in through the

Re: [Wikidata] [Analytics] [Wiki-Medicine] Zika

Some observations (maybe stating the obvious): https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/#start=2016-01-16=2016-02-14=en.wikipedia.org=all-access=user=Zika_virus the double peak seems to confirm PV count on wp:en is not correlated much with spread of the disease, but of course wp:es is much more