Re: [Wikidata] [Wikidata-tech] wb_terms redesign

Hi Alaa, On 25-04-19 16:38, Alaa Sarhan wrote: > This is really a defective redesign. It reintroduced numeric IDs to be removed by T114902. See also T179928. We should reconsider reintroduce a new table to link unperfixed and perfixed entity ID. The new schema has been optimized as much as

Re: [Wikidata] [Wikidata-tech] wb_terms redesign

Hello all, Since this email thread is shared accross various mailing-lists, in order to not create noise for too many people, I kindly ask you to continue the discussions oh Phabricator, where a task is dedicated to questions and issues. Thanks for your

Re: [Wikidata] [Wikidata-tech] wb_terms redesign

Alaa Sarhan, 25/04/19 17:38: Full migration is not possible unfortunately due to the current capacity of database master node. Can you clarify whether it would also be too much load to write both to the new table and the old wb_terms table for a transition period (controlled by a

Re: [Wikidata] [Wikidata-tech] wb_terms redesign

> This is really a defective redesign. It reintroduced numeric IDs to be removed by T114902. See also T179928. We should reconsider reintroduce a new table to link unperfixed and perfixed entity ID. The new schema has been optimized as much as possible to allow maximum scalability as it will