Hi Denny, all,
here is the second prototype of the new overarching DBpedia approach:
https://databus.dbpedia.org/vehnem/flexifusion/prefusion/2019.11.01
Datasets are grouped by property, DBpedia ontology is used, if exists.
Data contains all Wkipedia languages mapped via DBpedia, Wikidata
Hi Denny,
here are some initial points:
1. there is also the generic dataset from last month:
https://databus.dbpedia.org/dbpedia/generic/infobox-properties/2019.08.30
dataset (We still need to copy the docu on the bus). This has the
highest coverage, but lowest consistency. English has
Hi Marco,
On October 1, 2019 11:48:02 PM GMT+02:00, Marco Fossati
wrote:
>Hi Denny,
>
>Thanks for publishing your Colab notebook!
>I went through it and would like to share my first thoughts here. We
>can
>then move further discussion somewhere else.
>
>1. in general, how can we compare
Hoi,
As indicated by the DBpedia people, there are two ways in which data gets
into their latest Fusion offering. There is consensus, all the available
sources agree and, there is the notion where one source is deemed
authoritative. Remember, DBpedia uses sources outside of the Wikimedia
movement
Hi Denny,
Thanks for publishing your Colab notebook!
I went through it and would like to share my first thoughts here. We can
then move further discussion somewhere else.
1. in general, how can we compare datasets with totally different time
stamps? Wikidata is alive, Freebase is dead, and
Hi all,
as promised, now that I am back from my trip, here's my draft of the
comparison of Wikidata, DBpedia, and Freebase.
It is a draft, it is obviously potentially biased given my background,
etc., but I hope that we can work on it together to get it into a good
shape.
Markus, amusingly I
