Hi!
> Jane, now we are really going into the field of elastic search's
> relevancy calculation. When searching, things like popularity
> (pageviews), incoming links, number of different language wiki articles,
> article size, article quality (good/selected), and many other aspects
> could be used
Apologies for the brief and combined reply but I'm on mobile. Will try and
answer the DBpedia-related comments.
DBpedia provides out degree metrics ( number of outgoing links from an
article) and article size (in wikitext chars) directly through related
extractors that can be used for ranking.
Jane, now we are really going into the field of elastic search's relevancy
calculation. When searching, things like popularity (pageviews), incoming
links, number of different language wiki articles, article size, article
quality (good/selected), and many other aspects could be used to better the
Too bad, because it would be great for all sorts of project workflows!
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Stas Malyshev
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 8/2/16 11:36 PM, Jane Darnell wrote:
> > Would page props also give me the creation date of the Wikipedia page in
> > that specific
Hi!
On 8/2/16 11:36 PM, Jane Darnell wrote:
> Would page props also give me the creation date of the Wikipedia page in
> that specific sitelink? Because this is something I needed when
Don't think so and I don't think such data should be in Wikidata or WDQS
database - it's Wikipedia
Would page props also give me the creation date of the Wikipedia page in
that specific sitelink? Because this is something I needed when analyzing
the data for the TED speakers challenge. When running an international
writing challenge for Wikipedia it would be nice to rune a daily or weekly
count
Hi!
> If you think it is best to implement a more general feature that adds
> even more properties, then I am sure nobody will complain, but it sounds
> like more work to me. The number I was asking for is something that you
I don't think it's *much* more work, and I planned to do this work
On 03.08.2016 02:51, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
Is there a way we could have more than just the number of language
links? Eg number of incoming links from other wikipedia pages?
If we implement T129046 we can have any page props we want to :)
Of course, adding them for the whole DB would
On 03.08.2016 02:49, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
Oh, there is a little misunderstanding here. I have not suggested to
create a property "number of sitelinks in this document". What I propose
instead is to create a property "number of sitelinks for the document
associated with this entity". The
On 02.08.2016 22:28, Yuri Astrakhan wrote:
Is there a way we could have more than just the number of language
links? Eg number of incoming links from other wikipedia pages?
One could have other data added to the store, but this may be more work
depending on what you want. You ask about links
@Finn: I've tried to modify your second query to "Famous French females"
and I get a time out...Do you have the same issue?
El mar., 2 ago. 2016 a las 18:33, Finn Aarup Nielsen ()
escribió:
>
>
> On 08/02/2016 03:01 PM, Markus Kroetzsch wrote:
> > On 02.08.2016 13:11, Ghislain
On 2 August 2016 at 20:41, Markus Kroetzsch
wrote:
>
> I just proposed the simple and straightforward way to solve the practical
> problem at hand. It leads to shorter, more readable queries that execute
> faster. (I don't claim originality for this; it is the
On 02.08.2016 20:59, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
Am 02.08.2016 um 20:19 schrieb Markus Kroetzsch:
Oh, there is a little misunderstanding here. I have not suggested to create a
property "number of sitelinks in this document". What I propose instead is to
create a property "number of sitelinks for the
Am 02.08.2016 um 20:19 schrieb Markus Kroetzsch:
> Oh, there is a little misunderstanding here. I have not suggested to create a
> property "number of sitelinks in this document". What I propose instead is to
> create a property "number of sitelinks for the document associated with this
> entity".
On 02.08.2016 20:06, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
Am 02.08.2016 um 18:41 schrieb Andrew Gray:
I'd agree with both interpretations - the majority of people in Wikidata are
Using the existence of Wikipedia articles as a threshold, as suggested, seems a
pretty good test - it's flawed, of course, but it's
Am 02.08.2016 um 18:41 schrieb Andrew Gray:
> I'd agree with both interpretations - the majority of people in Wikidata are
> Using the existence of Wikipedia articles as a threshold, as suggested, seems
> a
> pretty good test - it's flawed, of course, but it's easy to check for and
> works
> as
On 08/02/2016 03:01 PM, Markus Kroetzsch wrote:
On 02.08.2016 13:11, Ghislain ATEMEZING wrote:
Thanks Yuri. I will try to define a kind a metric for those having a
number of wikipedia entries. For example, a person with 127 entries
would be "famous" while another with just 10 is not
On 02.08.2016 13:11, Ghislain ATEMEZING wrote:
Thanks Yuri. I will try to define a kind a metric for those having a
number of wikipedia entries. For example, a person with 127 entries
would be "famous" while another with just 10 is not "famous"...
Side remark @Stas: it could be very helpful
It seems to me it should be a class (a set of people), not an attribute.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Ghislain ATEMEZING
wrote:
> Thanks Yuri. I will try to define a kind a metric for those having a number
> of wikipedia entries. For example, a person with 127
Thanks Yuri. I will try to define a kind a metric for those having a
number of wikipedia entries. For example, a person with 127 entries would
be "famous" while another with just 10 is not "famous"...
El mar., 2 ago. 2016 a las 12:52, Yuri Astrakhan ()
escribió:
> Any
Any person in wikidata is "famous" - otherwise they wouldn't be notable and
therefore wouldn't be there))
If you prefer the stricter notability requirement(as used by Wikipedia),
search only for those that have a wikipedia page
On Aug 2, 2016 1:44 PM, "Ghislain ATEMEZING"
Thanks Gerard, I understand your point. Of course having an item is the
first key for notability.
You agree that if famous in Lille, then famous in France.
I've just seen this page http://www.thefamouspeople.com/ and I wonder how
they make their classification.
Best,
Ghislain
El mar., 2 ago.
Hoi,
There is not. The problem is that famous is very ambiguous. Famous in
France or famous in Lille? They may be notable and that is why they have an
item. Famous for a reason is possible; for instance because they won a
prize. So yes and no.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 2 August 2016 at 12:43,
Ahoy,
I am curious to know if there is a way to know that a given person is
"famous" in Wikidata. I want for example to retrieve "all famous French
people born after a given date".
Thanks in advance for your help.
Best,
Ghislain
--
---
"Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none" (W.
24 matches
Mail list logo