AndrewSu added a comment.
In T143819#3350566, @Nuria wrote:
To incentivize them to contribute, we have to give them even better metrics of community usage/impact that they can give to funders
Understood, as I said we are willing to help in any way we can, seems like a great objective. My main
AndrewSu added a comment.
We could, however (with some work) capture usage of certain property, or item, or property-item combination, in the original query. Would that be useful?
Property usage: I think there is some small-ish subset of properties that are very closely tied to a single data
AndrewSu added a comment.
My initial thought is that there will be two types of metrics. First, we want to look at statement-level metrics. For all the statements that our team has loaded into Wikidata, we have been referencing specific resources that assert that statement. For example, see
AndrewSu added a comment.
Just want to add a note that if someone on the WMF side was interested in building the infrastructure to compute these usage metrics, the "Gene Wiki" team would be very willing collaborators in evaluating and refining the metrics. We have been working ha
AndrewSu added a comment.
Thank you @leila for the guidance on the process and next steps -- very helpful! @I9606 and I will touch base to see how we want to proceed/prioritize from our end...TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T143819EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org
AndrewSu added a comment.
@mkroetzsch Thank you for the info. We look forward to coordinating more when/if you see fit in the future.
Since our project is not dependent on Markus' work, and since I don't believe that our work will negatively impact Markus' project, I propose we treat our request
AndrewSu added a comment.
Would it be possible for our team to get access to these log files so that we can perform our analyses that are related to, but distinct from, the ones that @mkroetzsch is doing? We are happy to coordinate with Markus so that there is no duplication of effort. But, I
