[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T114477: [RfC] Future of the Article Placeholder Extension

Lucie added a comment. That might make sense since I'm not sure whether it can be discussed much in detail yet. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T114477 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Lucie Cc: Qgil, aude, daniel,

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T114477: [RfC] Future of the Article Placeholder Extension

Qgil added a comment. What should we do, then? Mark this task blocked by T114251: [RFC] Magic Infobox implementation and focus on that RfC for the Summit? Or do you still want to keep this task as a Summit proposal? TASK DETAIL

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T114477: [RfC] Future of the Article Placeholder Extension

Qgil added a comment. Hi @Lucie, this proposal is focusing on a Summit session but there is no indication topics that could be discussed here before, and therefore it is missing active discussion now. Note that pre-scheduled Summit sessions are expected to be preceded by online discussions and

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T114477: [RfC] Future of the Article Placeholder Extension

Qgil added a subscriber: Qgil. Qgil added a comment. Congratulations! This is one of the 52 proposals that made it through the first deadline of the https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/tag/wikimedia-developer-summit-2016/ selection process