Addshore added a comment.
In T118498#4421115, @thiemowmde wrote:
Personally, I don't think it makes sense to touch the string datatype in any machine-readable output. (In other words: I don't think this is worth a breaking change.) But I think it makes sense to prefer $propertyType as a variable n
thiemowmde added a comment.
Personally, I don't think it makes sense to touch the string datatype in any machine-readable output. (In other words: I don't think this is worth a breaking change.) But I think it makes sense to prefer $propertyType as a variable name in code, and "property data type"
Addshore added a comment.
In T118498#2308748, @Lydia_Pintscher wrote:
We have trained people on datatype now and it is all our user-facing documentation. I think changing this now to introduce yet another term creates more confusion than it resolves.
/me agrees
In T118498#3132096, @thiemowmde
Lydia_Pintscher added a comment.
We have trained people on datatype now and it is all our user-facing
documentation. I think changing this now to introduce yet another term creates
more confusion than it resolves.
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T118498
EMAIL PREFERENCES
h