Lea_Lacroix_WMDE added a comment.
Indeed, I transmitted the request, but the language committee should give an advice about this.TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T154589EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: Lea_Lacroix_WMDECc: Izno,
Esc3300 added a comment.
She does Community communcations on WikiData dev stuff. There is an outline of the process at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Help:Monolingual_text_languages . Apparently she doesn't think it's answered by that and needs some feedback for the community. In any case, it's not
Aklapper added a comment.
Hmm, why is this assigned to Lea_Lacroix_WMDE ?
This sounds like it has already been answered in T151186#2916448. If not, it sounds like something for the language committee instead.TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T154589EMAIL
Esc3300 added a comment.
It might be worth keeping in mind the difference (or the absence thereof) between the following:
language code for monolingual string
language code for labels/descriptions
language code for interface
language code with fallback to another variant of the same language
Izno added a comment.
en is en-ambiguous. en-gb is "standard English" in that it is English spoken by persons living in England and the other countries in Great Britain. User appears to have a battleground mentality on what he believes English is and what the rest of the world thinks English
