[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T201774: Adding WikiData item number to resource in en.wikiversity

Marshallsumter added a comment. Thanks! That does work to put the WikiData qid number on the page. It would be great to have it under Page information per user:matej_suchanek's code listed above on Aug 14 2018, 2:26 AM. Consensus is not required. TASK DETAIL

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T201774: Adding WikiData item number to resource in en.wikiversity

Liuxinyu970226 added a comment. @Marshallsumter Will this template from Mul.wikisource helps you? TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T201774 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T201774: Adding WikiData item number to resource in en.wikiversity

Marshallsumter added a comment. The Opinions and apparent consensus has now been archived by bot to https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive/2018/08#Opinions_and_an_apparent_consensus.TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T201774EMAIL

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T201774: Adding WikiData item number to resource in en.wikiversity

Marshallsumter added a comment. Just to be clear, the statements I quoted contain the exact literal meaning as written by each user and nothing presented "looks like [or is] a gross misinterpretation". By USA convention, anyone who disagrees with their own exact literal meaning as I've stated it

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T201774: Adding WikiData item number to resource in en.wikiversity

Marshallsumter added a comment. The email I received also went to all or nearly all of those on the lists that I used to arrive at an apparent consensus. I'm happy to wait for them to clarify!TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T201774EMAIL

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T201774: Adding WikiData item number to resource in en.wikiversity

Aklapper added a comment. In T201774#4541972, @Marshallsumter wrote: Thanks for reminding me about the sources. The first 17 are from [[d:Wikidata:Project_chat/Archive/2014/05#What_do_do_with_Wikipedia:Draft_articles]], It looks like you only copied some text from

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T201774: Adding WikiData item number to resource in en.wikiversity

Marshallsumter added a comment. Well, it's been 8-9 days and consensus is still at 84 %. Can you implement the change per user:matej_suchanek?TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T201774EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: MarshallsumterCc:

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T201774: Adding WikiData item number to resource in en.wikiversity

Marshallsumter added a comment. Thanks for reminding me about the sources. The first 17 are from [[d:Wikidata:Project_chat/Archive/2014/05#What_do_do_with_Wikipedia:Draft_articles]], https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Project_chat/Archive/2014/05#What_do_do_with_Wikipedia:Draft_articles. I

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T201774: Adding WikiData item number to resource in en.wikiversity

Marshallsumter added a comment. Add opinion of IP 61.170.244.181 on 23:26, 22 August 2018 (UTC) on [[d:Wikidata talk:Notability#Google search comparisons]] or https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata_talk:Notability#Google_search_comparisons for 10/14 = 0.71. So please enact matej_suchanek

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T201774: Adding WikiData item number to resource in en.wikiversity

Marshallsumter added a comment. Please keep in mind all I'm asking is for those WikiData items that exist to display that WikiData item number in Wikiversity. For example, [[v:Draft:Abstract concept generator]] has WikiData item number Q50011734. Here's the opinions from

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T201774: Adding WikiData item number to resource in en.wikiversity

Marshallsumter added a comment. Regarding Wikipedia use "Draft ns is excluded since 2015 after the discussion at Wikidata:Project_chat/Archive/2014/05#What_do_do_with_Wikipedia:Draft_articles" on https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Changes_to_Wikidata_items

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T201774: Adding WikiData item number to resource in en.wikiversity

Marshallsumter added a comment. I've made on entry on [[d:Wikidata_talk:Notability#Changes_to_Wikidata_items]] or https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata_talk:Notability#Changes_to_Wikidata_items.TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T201774EMAIL

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T201774: Adding WikiData item number to resource in en.wikiversity

Marshallsumter added a comment. No! I'm not asking for a rule alteration! As it is literally written, the rule is fine.TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T201774EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: MarshallsumterCc: YMS, Ymblanter,

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T201774: Adding WikiData item number to resource in en.wikiversity

Liuxinyu970226 added a comment. @Marshallsumter So you mean that we should alter that rule to e.g. ...pages in User or (with the exception of Wikiversity) Draft namespace... (another way) On Wikiversity, pages in Draft namespace are however allowed. Or you want to add such exception in WD:N/IC

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T201774: Adding WikiData item number to resource in en.wikiversity

Marshallsumter added a comment. "Is this task means that you think that this restriction should be cancelled?" No! The links referred to are links in Wikiversity to resource pages, for example, 96 % of conscripted Draft: ns items contain valid links! And meet criterion 1: "It contains at least one