[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T236884: [Recurring task] Upstream changes to Blazegraph that we have in our own fork

dcausse added a comment. @Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE thanks! I'll update the ticket. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T236884 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: dcausse Cc: Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, dcausse, Igorkim78, Gehel, A

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T236884: [Recurring task] Upstream changes to Blazegraph that we have in our own fork

Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE added a comment. Sure, sorry, I didn’t realize you wouldn’t be able to see it. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T236884 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE Cc: Lucas_Werkmeiste

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T236884: [Recurring task] Upstream changes to Blazegraph that we have in our own fork

dcausse added a comment. In T236884#6011470 , @Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE wrote: > In T236884#6011023 , @dcausse wrote: > >> In T236884#6010962

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T236884: [Recurring task] Upstream changes to Blazegraph that we have in our own fork

Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE added a comment. In T236884#6011023 , @dcausse wrote: > In T236884#6010962 , @Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE wrote: > >> T169862 is a security issue (still not public)

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T236884: [Recurring task] Upstream changes to Blazegraph that we have in our own fork

dcausse added a comment. Apparently your contribution was copied and applied in https://github.com/blazegraph/database/commit/7bad8c40d608f57dc1f47cbf88c87d3029caf31d not sure how they plan to manage the public PRs like the one you opened if they simply copy the contribution to what seems to

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T236884: [Recurring task] Upstream changes to Blazegraph that we have in our own fork

dcausse added a comment. In T236884#6010962 , @Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE wrote: > T169862 is a security issue (still not public) that was fixed in our instance, but I have no idea where the fix lives or whether it should be upstreamed.