[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T240675: DispatchingValueSnakRdfBuilder::getValueBuilder: No RDF builder defined for data type wikibase-lexeme nor for value type bad.

Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE added a comment. In T240675#5739162 , @Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE wrote: > Looks like lexicographical data types are missing from the data type definititions: I think this was a red herring, sorry. WikibaseLexeme

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T240675: DispatchingValueSnakRdfBuilder::getValueBuilder: No RDF builder defined for data type wikibase-lexeme nor for value type bad.

Michael added a comment. `\Wikibase\Rdf\DispatchingValueSnakRdfBuilder::addValue` seems to get an `UnDeserializableValue` This is hard to reproduce, as apparently https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:EntityData/Q16502.ttl?flavor=dump&nocache=1576233849693 was one of the affected urls,

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T240675: DispatchingValueSnakRdfBuilder::getValueBuilder: No RDF builder defined for data type wikibase-lexeme nor for value type bad.

Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE added a comment. Looks like lexicographical data types are missing from the data type definititions: lucaswerkmeister-wmde@mwdebug1001:~$ mwscript eval.php wikidatawiki <<< 'var_export( array_keys( \Wikibase\Repo\WikibaseRepo::getDefaultInstance()->getDataTypeDe

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T240675: DispatchingValueSnakRdfBuilder::getValueBuilder: No RDF builder defined for data type wikibase-lexeme nor for value type bad.

Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE added a comment. Most likely due to the “subject lexeme” statements on https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q16502; and indeed, in the generated TTL the values for these statements are missing: wd:Q16502 p:P6254 s:Q16502-c103fdc1-42b3-4acd-ae27-f89dcb5efcfd . s