gerritbot added a comment.
Change 333891 had a related patch set uploaded (by Ladsgroup):
Allow RFDa meta tags
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/333891TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T88475EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: thiemowmde,
Sjoerddebruin added a comment.
I've noticed that the descriptions of biografischportaal.nl always show up in Google, because they include the label again in the description. Maybe we need to add something like "Structured data about [label], [description]"?TASK
gerritbot added a comment.
Change 306425 merged by jenkins-bot:
Set on entity pages
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/306425TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T88475EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: thiemowmde, gerritbotCc: Denny,
Sjoerddebruin added a comment.
https://yoast.com/meta-descriptions/ has some tips about meta descriptions. Some recommendations are a call-to-action and the focus keyword should be included somehow.TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T88475EMAIL
gerritbot added a comment.
Change 306425 had a related patch set uploaded (by Thiemo Mättig (WMDE)):
Set on entity pages
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/306425TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T88475EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To:
Sjoerddebruin added a comment.
How hard is it to do this? It would be a huge improvement to the display of Wikidata items on Google.TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T88475EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: SjoerddebruinCc: jeblad,
jeblad added a comment.
Descriptions should go into meta-elements no matter if the search engines
uses them or not, simply because it is the right thing to do.
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T88475
EMAIL PREFERENCES
adrianheine added a comment.
In https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T88475#1791752, @aude wrote:
> https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/F2928636 reminder, this is still a problem
> and also why we need to be able to reorder statement groups.
How does reordering statement groups help with that?
thiemowmde added a comment.
Reordering probably helps because the most relevant statements are on top and
more likely to be picked by search engines as a description.
Please note that search engines usually prefer content snippets over meta
description. But this does not mean we should not do
adrianheine added a comment.
Ah, sorry, this is about ordering, not grouping. That's all right :)
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T88475
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: adrianheine
Cc: Ricordisamoa, Snaterlicious,
adrianheine added a comment.
But we are not actually planning on putting »the most relevant statements« on
top, are we?
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T88475
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: adrianheine
Cc:
aude added a comment.
In https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T88475#1807312, @adrianheine wrote:
> But we are not actually planning on putting »the most relevant statements« on
> top, are we?
I am sure people in the community would like to move most relevant statements
to the top (me being one
aude added a comment.
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/F2928636 reminder, this is still a problem
and also why we need to be able to reorder statement groups.
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T88475
EMAIL PREFERENCES
13 matches
Mail list logo
