Zache added a comment.
add flaggedrevision extension to wikidata.org? I don't it is suitable for
wikidata.org, but i don't think that is what @tgr asked in the ticket.
I read the ticket so that there should be a possibility to a downstream wiki
(fi.wikipedia.org , hu.wikipedia.org,
Liuxinyu970226 added a comment.
@Zache So you want this to be installed on Wikidata.org?
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T201765
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: Liuxinyu970226
Cc: Liuxinyu970226, Zache, Alensha,
Zache added a comment.
I think that this requires that patrol/autopatrol flags from Wikidata should
be propagated to the local wiki to be useful. (other way it will just flood the
local wiki)
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T201765
EMAIL PREFERENCES
Alensha added a comment.
I would love to have this feature in Hungarian Wikipedia. There were many instances of incorrect information or untranslated words appearing in infoboxes and in many cases they were noticed only weeks or months later. If Flaggedrevs could mark these pages as needing
MaxBioHazard added a comment.
As a ruwiki user I support stjn. Realisation of your proposal would mean that more than a 50% ruwiki articles will be always unpatrolled, because
many ruwiki articles contains Wikidata data through infobox
Wikidata elements about any notable entity are edited very
stjn added a comment.
I would say that this potentially would be a very, very, I mean, very bad feature for any project that uses both Wikidata and FlaggedRevs extensively. This unpatrolling routinely means that you have to recheck pages because file description on Commons changed in some time.
