[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T191885: Reflect atomic changes in wbeditentity summary
Pablo-WMDE added a comment. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/diffusion/EWLE/browse/master/src/Api/Summary/FormSummaryAggregator.php represents a first step into this directionTASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T191885EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: Pablo-WMDECc: matej_suchanek, Pintoch, Jakob_WMDE, Addshore, WMDE-leszek, Pablo-WMDE, Aklapper, Lydia_Pintscher, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Darkdadaah, Mbch331___ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T191885: Reflect atomic changes in wbeditentity summary
WMDE-leszek added a comment. @matej_suchanek: Partly, but as I get it, this is more general than the other one? This include (at least on the level of considering) possible "joining" of "appropriate autocomments" when there are multiple, whereas as I get the other, it is about using the "atomic" summary, when only atomic change has been made. Or do I get it wrong?TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T191885EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: WMDE-leszekCc: matej_suchanek, Pintoch, Jakob_WMDE, Addshore, WMDE-leszek, Pablo-WMDE, Aklapper, Lydia_Pintscher, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Darkdadaah, Mbch331___ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T191885: Reflect atomic changes in wbeditentity summary
Pintoch added a comment. It would be fantastic to have more meaningful edit summaries with wbeditentity. It's of course hard to do this in general, but it would be great to have this for some common cases where a short summary seems doable (adding multiple statements with the same property, for instance).TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T191885EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: PintochCc: Pintoch, Jakob_WMDE, Addshore, WMDE-leszek, Pablo-WMDE, Aklapper, Lydia_Pintscher, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Darkdadaah, Mbch331___ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T191885: Reflect atomic changes in wbeditentity summary
WMDE-leszek added a comment. Apparently Watchlist entries on client wikis already have summary changes presented in a single line. @Lydia_Pintscher says that doing something similar in this case would be appropriate. TODO: add screenshot of the client wiki watchlist, possibly some more code pointers etcTASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T191885EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: WMDE-leszekCc: Jakob_WMDE, Addshore, WMDE-leszek, Pablo-WMDE, Aklapper, Lydia_Pintscher, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Darkdadaah, Mbch331___ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
